On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 23:17:21 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> This the only test which was created to check different types of
>> interpolation.
>> It checks the rendering to the VolatileImage and uses BufferedImage as a
>> gold image.
>> But it does not take into account that rendering to the
> This the only test which was created to check different types of
> interpolation.
> It checks the rendering to the VolatileImage and uses BufferedImage as a gold
> image.
> But it does not take into account that rendering to the VolatileImage might
> be affected
> by the HiDPI support.
>
>
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 21:54:43 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> This the only test which was created to check different types of
> interpolation.
> It checks the rendering to the VolatileImage and uses BufferedImage as a gold
> image.
> But it does not take into account that rendering to the
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 21:54:43 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> This the only test which was created to check different types of
> interpolation.
> It checks the rendering to the VolatileImage and uses BufferedImage as a gold
> image.
> But it does not take into account that rendering to the
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 21:54:43 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> This the only test which was created to check different types of
> interpolation.
> It checks the rendering to the VolatileImage and uses BufferedImage as a gold
> image.
> But it does not take into account that rendering to the
This the only test which was created to check different types of interpolation.
It checks the rendering to the VolatileImage and uses BufferedImage as a gold
image.
But it does not take into account that rendering to the VolatileImage might be
affected
by the HiDPI support.
Old review request:
> On 02-Sep-2020, at 10:46 AM, Sergey Bylokhov
> wrote:
>
> On 01.09.2020 03:42, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
>>>
>>> In the HiDPI mode the VolatileImage internally have twice more pixels than
>>> BufferedImage, so when we draw the data to
>>> the VolatileImage and then scale it back to the size of
On 01.09.2020 03:42, Ajit Ghaisas wrote:
In the HiDPI mode the VolatileImage internally have twice more pixels than
BufferedImage, so when we draw the data to
the VolatileImage and then scale it back to the size of the BufferedImage for
comparison, the test fails.
This looks good. I checked
On 25.08.2020 14:59, Philip Race wrote:
This is fine but
1) I like to see the bug under which you fixed it in the @bug list.
It is not a product bug and the test isn't reworked, so it is not necessary to
have this test fix in the list of bugs
2) I am not sure I see how all the various
This is fine but
1) I like to see the bug under which you fixed it in the @bug list.
2) I am not sure I see how all the various reasons for this test failing
can be explained by this.
-phil.
On 8/25/20, 1:37 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk/client.
Bug:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk/client.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171303
Fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8171303/webrev.00
This the only test which was created to check different types of interpolation.
It checks the rendering to the VolatileImage and uses
11 matches
Mail list logo
