On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 23:42:55 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> This is a request to clean up a desktop module as was done in JDK-8233884
>> for "java.base" module.
>>
>> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
>> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>>
>> This
> This is a request to clean up a desktop module as was done in JDK-8233884 for
> "java.base" module.
>
> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>
> This could be done more efficiently(x20 time faster) with use of
>
> This is a request to clean up a desktop module as was done in JDK-8233884 for
> "java.base" module.
>
> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>
> This could be done more efficiently(x20 time faster) with use of
>
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 22:03:54 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>
> I am fine to do that, if there are no objections I can change the whole fix.
Modifying the entire changeset seems like an overkill.
Using static imports in only one file is _inconsistent_, yet it makes the
places where the encodings
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 21:54:08 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> it is aligned already, the StandardCharsets.UTF_8 is parameter of "new
>> String()", not the getTransferData.
>
> Ah, right!
> But it's confusing: it looks as if `StandardCharsets.UTF_8` is a parameter to
> `getTransferData`. Maybe avoid
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 21:18:40 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
>> Sergey Bylokhov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional
>>
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 19:37:04 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>> This is a request to clean up a desktop module as was done in JDK-8233884
>> for "java.base" module.
>>
>> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
>> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>>
>> This
> This is a request to clean up a desktop module as was done in JDK-8233884 for
> "java.base" module.
>
> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>
> This could be done more efficiently(x20 time faster) with use of
>
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 07:07:21 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> This is a request to clean up a desktop module as was done in JDK-8233884 for
> "java.base" module.
>
> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>
> This could be
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 13:30:28 GMT, Alexander Zvegintsev
wrote:
>> This is a request to clean up a desktop module as was done in JDK-8233884
>> for "java.base" module.
>>
>> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
>> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>>
>>
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 07:07:21 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> This is a request to clean up a desktop module as was done in JDK-8233884 for
> "java.base" module.
>
> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>
> This could be
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 07:07:21 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> This is a request to clean up a desktop module as was done in JDK-8233884 for
> "java.base" module.
>
> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>
> This could be
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 07:07:21 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> This is a request to clean up a desktop module as was done in JDK-8233884 for
> "java.base" module.
>
> In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
> absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
>
> This could be
This is a request to clean up a desktop module as was done in JDK-8233884 for
"java.base" module.
In many places standard charsets are looked up via their names, for example:
absolutePath.getBytes("UTF-8");
This could be done more efficiently(x20 time faster) with use of
14 matches
Mail list logo
