Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Should changes to client libraries be pushed to jdk9/dev instead of jdk9/client

2014-02-02 Thread Alan Bateman
On 31/01/2014 23:46, Joseph Darcy wrote: : Discussions are on going as to which forest client libraries fixes should go into, the client forest (where closed-source deployment changes happen to be going) or to the dev forest where all the other libraries work is going; FWIW, I favor the

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Should changes to client libraries be pushed to jdk9/dev instead of jdk9/client

2014-01-31 Thread Alan Bateman
On 31/01/2014 09:08, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: On 26.01.2014 13:30, Alan Bateman wrote: As a side point, client changes have been going into jdk9/client rather than jdk9/dev so I just wonder if there might be changes backed up in jdk9/client that might cause issues when merged. It will be really

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Should changes to client libraries be pushed to jdk9/dev instead of jdk9/client

2014-01-31 Thread Joseph Darcy
On 1/31/2014 2:05 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 31/01/2014 09:08, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: On 26.01.2014 13:30, Alan Bateman wrote: As a side point, client changes have been going into jdk9/client rather than jdk9/dev so I just wonder if there might be changes backed up in jdk9/client that might