Hi Sergey,
On 22.05.2014 1:44, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 5/21/14 10:13 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Sergey,
The original fix provides some updates and clarifications to the javadoc for the
LightweightContent.imageBufferReset() method, but they are missing from your fix. Is this
intentional?
On 2014-05-22 02:49, Omair Majid wrote:
* Andrew Hughes [2014-05-21 20:23]:
- Original Message -
* Andrew Hughes [2014-05-21 12:22]:
I'm not keen on the hardcoding of '-ljpeg'
+ LIBJPEG_LIBS := -ljpeg
There's no pkg-config files for it. Any suggestions on how to get
something gen
On 5/22/14 11:47 AM, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
Hi Sergey,
On 22.05.2014 1:44, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 5/21/14 10:13 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Sergey,
The original fix provides some updates and clarifications to the
javadoc for the LightweightContent.imageBufferReset() method, but
they ar
On 22.05.2014 15:36, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 5/22/14 11:47 AM, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
Hi Sergey,
On 22.05.2014 1:44, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 5/21/14 10:13 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Sergey,
The original fix provides some updates and clarifications to the javadoc for the
LightweightCo
On 5/22/14 5:58 PM, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
On 22.05.2014 15:36, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 5/22/14 11:47 AM, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
Hi Sergey,
On 22.05.2014 1:44, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 5/21/14 10:13 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
Hi Sergey,
The original fix provides some updates and clarifi
BTW .. I just realised I haven't seen a bug ID in this thread.
Does one already exist ?
-phil.
On 5/21/14 5:49 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
* Andrew Hughes [2014-05-21 20:23]:
- Original Message -
* Andrew Hughes [2014-05-21 12:22]:
I'm not keen on the hardcoding of '-ljpeg'
+ LIBJPEG_
- Original Message -
>
> On 2014-05-22 02:49, Omair Majid wrote:
> > * Andrew Hughes [2014-05-21 20:23]:
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> * Andrew Hughes [2014-05-21 12:22]:
> I'm not keen on the hardcoding of '-ljpeg'
>
> + LIBJPEG_LIBS := -ljpeg
> >>> There's n
* Phil Race [2014-05-22 16:02]:
> BTW .. I just realised I haven't seen a bug ID in this thread.
> Does one already exist ?
No. I was going to create one before I push.
Thanks,
Omair
--
PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681
Hi Sergey,
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8029455/webrev.02
The fix looks fine to me.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 5/22/2014 10:05 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 5/22/14 5:58 PM, Anton V. Tarasov wrote:
On 22.05.2014 15:36, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 5/22/14 11:47 AM, Anton V. Tarasov wrot
I think that it would be useful to have a bug id prior to sending a
review request, so that a review thread for the bug can be easily found
in the mailing archive. In the future, please do file a bug first and
put its id in the subject line of your review requests.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On
* Anthony Petrov [2014-05-22 16:48]:
> I think that it would be useful to have a bug id prior to sending a review
> request, so that a review thread for the bug can be easily found in the
> mailing archive. In the future, please do file a bug first and put its id in
> the subject line of your revi
Thanks, Omair.
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 5/23/2014 1:01 AM, Omair Majid wrote:
* Anthony Petrov [2014-05-22 16:48]:
I think that it would be useful to have a bug id prior to sending a review
request, so that a review thread for the bug can be easily found in the
mailing archive. In the futu
JDK 9 changeset :
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/006f772bbc7e
Identical JDK 8 backport: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8042850
JDK 9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/006f772bbc7e
Identical JDK 8 backport: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8042855
-phil.
On 5/22/14 2:39 PM, Phil Race wrote:
JDK 9 changeset :
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/006f772bbc7e
Sorry copy paste problems that should have been
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/be332c33c5a0
Identical JDK 8 backport: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8042850
JDK 9
Checked. They are identical.
- Jennifer
On 5/22/2014 2:45 PM, Phil Race wrote:
On 5/22/14 2:39 PM, Phil Race wrote:
JDK 9 changeset :
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/006f772bbc7e
Sorry copy paste problems that should have been
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/be33
15 matches
Mail list logo