Thanks a lot, Jim! This sheds light on the subject and really sounds
promising.
Anton.
On 10/6/2016 9:31 PM, Jim Graham wrote:
Ah, I see.
There are a lot of mistaken assumptions in the rendering there. It's
not just line thickness, it is assumptions about stroke control and
positioning of
Looks fine.
I am not only sure about the difference in the variable names: "name" VS
"face".
On 16.10.16 22:02, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote:
I guess you could reorder the calls for CFRelease(font); and
CFRelease(desc); so the desc gets released first in two locations under
family == NULL and name
Harmless either way but I have committed as you suggest.
-phil.
On 10/16/16, 12:02 PM, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote:
I guess you could reorder the calls for CFRelease(font); and
CFRelease(desc); so the desc gets released first in two locations
under family == NULL and name == NULL.
Just for the
On 10/17/16, 5:32 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Looks fine.
I am not only sure about the difference in the variable names: "name"
VS "face".
Our code - and API - tends to use "name" or "full name"
-phil.
On 16.10.16 22:02, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote:
I guess you could reorder the calls for
