On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:17:58 GMT, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
>> Ok, sorry for the distraction.
>
> Our local Santuario maintainer says:
>
> In general, changes to Apache Santuario should also be made at Apache so we
> stay in sync.
Hi @doom369, I hope we didn't end up wasting too much of your tim
Michael,
Thanks for splitting up the patches and revising them in response to the review
comments.
I'm not yet entirely sure how to proceed with pushing these changes. I think
Chris assumed that I would push these changes. Since these are in awt,
printing, and beans, the changes might need t
On 9/11/12 1:41 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
* By contrast lines 1035 and 1115 here are now much, much > 80 chars
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~art/Bugathon-2012/webrev.imageio/src/share/classes/javax/imageio/ImageIO.java.sdiff.html
Also for both of these cases, you added .asSubClass(..).
Now when I
Hi all,
Please review this following code and API change:
Bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8068749
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~smarks/reviews/8068749/webrev.0/
The change is to be pushed into the jdk9/client forest.
The background is that this is a "prepar
Hi all,
I still need a second reviewer for this change. Thanks.
s'marks
On 8/3/15 1:49 PM, Phil Race wrote:
CCC is approved. So I will give this a "+1" .. you just need one other reviewer
(if
you did not get that already) and you can push.
-phil.
On 07/27/2015 07:10 PM, Stu
