On 10/17/16, 5:32 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Looks fine.
I am not only sure about the difference in the variable names: "name"
VS "face".
Our code - and API - tends to use "name" or "full name"
-phil.
On 16.10.16 22:02, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote:
I guess you could reorder the calls for
Harmless either way but I have committed as you suggest.
-phil.
On 10/16/16, 12:02 PM, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote:
I guess you could reorder the calls for CFRelease(font); and
CFRelease(desc); so the desc gets released first in two locations
under family == NULL and name == NULL.
Just for the
Looks fine.
I am not only sure about the difference in the variable names: "name" VS
"face".
On 16.10.16 22:02, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote:
I guess you could reorder the calls for CFRelease(font); and
CFRelease(desc); so the desc gets released first in two locations under
family == NULL and name
I guess you could reorder the calls for CFRelease(font); and
CFRelease(desc); so the desc gets released first in two locations under
family == NULL and name == NULL.
Just for the sake of consistency.
Other than that, +1.
Vadim
On 16.10.2016 19:09, Philip Race wrote:
Anyone ? I'd like to get
Anyone ? I'd like to get this backported to 8u this week so it
can the 8u122 release which will enter RDP2 soon
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8u/releases/8u122.html
Although I have failed to find any email documenting the exact date
the freeze is usually a week earlier than the RDP date
