+1
Vadim
On 16.02.2017 15:13, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Looks fine.
Hello,
Could you review a simple fix for jdk9, please?
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175025
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8175025/webrev.00/
Changed the license in the test to GP
Looks fine.
>
> Hello,
>
> Could you review a simple fix for jdk9, please?
>
> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175025
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8175025/webrev.00/
>
> Changed the license in the test to GPL v2.
>
> Thanks,
> Dmitry
Hello,
Could you review a simple fix for jdk9, please?
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175025
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8175025/webrev.00/
Changed the license in the test to GPL v2.
Thanks,
Dmitry