Phil,
In the following bug, you propose to remove the ServiceLoader in the
RenderingEngine class:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038875
For now the jdk has only ductus and pisces engines but I am working on
marlin which is an improved pisces:
https://github.com/bourgesl/marlin-renderer
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8037511
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8037511/webrev.00/
Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code
affected.
Thanks.
Regards,
Alexander
Hello Jim,
On 28.03.2014 3:25, Jim Graham wrote:
Hi Anton,
A lot of those tests seem out of whack in that they test related
conditions, but not the exact condition itself. What we really want
is for every index of the form:
offset + y * scanlineStride + x + {0 - numcomponents-1} = [0,
Looks good.
- Jennifer
On 03/29/2014 03:00 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Sergey Jennifer,
Please review/check 6 MacOSX backports of JNI correctness fixes of
changes
you previously reviewed approved for JDK 9.
They are all one per-file and exact copies of what was pushed into
jdk9/client.
I have
On 4/1/14 3:09 AM, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
Phil,
In the following bug, you propose to remove the ServiceLoader in the
RenderingEngine class:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8038875
For now the jdk has only ductus and pisces engines but I am working on
marlin which is an improved
Hi Laurent,
Yes, we'll keep the system property (at least for JDK 9) that should support
Class.forName usage. In the JDK I expect well just look for ductus by name
then pisces, all hard-coded, but the system property would be an
over-ride.
Its just using the ServiceLoader to then locate the
It appears that this issue was resolved only in JDK8. Would it be possible
to get https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7068471 back ported to
OpenJDK7 and released in an update?
Thanks!
Travis
The bug database says it was backported to 7u40 almost 18 months ago ..
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8002062
-phil.
On 4/1/14 3:05 PM, Travis Rogers wrote:
It appears that this issue was resolved only in JDK8. Would it be
possible to get