f course the issue that raises is exposing everyone's email addresses
to spammers. There's the old name AT service DOT com replacement,
but I'm still chewing on that one.
just remove the mail addresses. simple as that.
(for future archives, take a look at
of reasons.
ML
-Original Message-
From: David Gillies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 5:16 PM
To: 313 Detroit
Subject: Re: (313) Searchable Archives
Sakari Karipuro wrote:
Dan Sicko wrote on Tue, 6 Jan 2004 about following:
f course the issue that raises
I'm sure this has been asked before, but is there a searchable archive
for the 313 list? If not, is anyone working on getting one going? Or
does there need to be someone to get it going (I can help)?
On Jan 6, 2004, at 8:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure this has been asked before, but is there a searchable archive
for the 313 list? If not, is anyone working on getting one going? Or
does there need to be someone to get it going (I can help)?
I've been toying with it. Right now
Do you not require peoples permission to publish their email address' in a
public place?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Sicko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 January 2004 3:07
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) Searchable Archives
On Jan 6, 2004, at 8:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED
I never said I resolved the issue!
-d
On Jan 6, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT) wrote:
Do you not require peoples permission to publish their email address'
in a
public place?
No.
-Joe
Do you not require peoples permission to publish their
email address' in a
public place?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Sicko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 January 2004 3:07
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) Searchable Archives
On Jan 6, 2004, at 8:30 AM, [EMAIL
Dan Sicko wrote on Tue, 6 Jan 2004 about following:
Of course the issue that raises is exposing everyone's email addresses
to spammers. There's the old name AT service DOT com replacement,
but I'm still chewing on that one.
just remove the mail addresses. simple as that.
(for future
Sakari Karipuro wrote:
Dan Sicko wrote on Tue, 6 Jan 2004 about following:
f course the issue that raises is exposing everyone's email addresses
to spammers. There's the old name AT service DOT com replacement,
but I'm still chewing on that one.
just remove the mail addresses. simple
