RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread David Powers
Wow you just discovered an incredible new way to market classical music!!! dave MEK wrote: that's the stupid thing about revivals - it's very contrived, like the recent electro revival of the last several years. Why the fashion and focus on those years? To be into the music, why do people

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread The REAL Mxyzptlk
wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and placing fake birthmarks over their lips. I was doing this WAY before it was cool. jeff

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
It's the new punk. Anyone have Malcolm McLaren's number? MEK David Powers

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread The REAL Mxyzptlk
wearing powdered wigs and lacy shirts and placing fake birthmarks over their lips. At 10:36 AM 6/16/2003, you wrote: It's the new punk. Anyone have Malcolm McLaren's number? Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-) jeff

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
Ah but I'm putting a twist on it- i'm call this Nü Romantiks MEK The REAL Mxyzptlk

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Fabrizio Nahum
FASCIST Ah but I'm putting a twist on it- i'm call this Nü Romantiks MEK The REAL Mxyzptlk [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 313@hyperreal.org omcast.net cc:

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Ian
On 6/16/03 1:04 PM, The REAL Mxyzptlk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-) Let's not dis the New Romantics, now. How else would we have gotten Frequency 7? Back on topic, -- im

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread The REAL Mxyzptlk
Nah - it's just another retread. Remember the New Romantics? :-) Let's not dis the New Romantics, now. How else would we have gotten Frequency 7? Or Atom and the Ants :-) jeff (Dirk isn't the only one wearing white sox)

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-16 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post) 06/16/03 12:52 PM

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-14 Thread spacecrusher
I think the big irritating thing about the electro revival is that the fashion oriented way people get all concerned about it being a trend in the first place. let me put it this way-there isn't anything stopping the producers, djs, and would be fans of Acid house to go make some acid house

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Andrew Hodgson
Matt Hellige wrote: [Fabrizio Nahum [EMAIL PROTECTED]] i guess we agree on this :) i cant wait for the early-to-midnineties-uk-melodictechno-revival! i think it will be a little hard to market though ;) And I can't wait for the Kanzleramt: the early years revival! Revival fever!

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread rob
The big Issue here is are we in a true state of an Acid House Revival. I don't think so and I don't think we've ever seen one!! I love all of the early 80's work i.e. Detroit Techno, Chicago House, New York Garage, Acid and all the other one offs that made up the UK Acid House Scene. That is

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Andrew Hodgson
That's cool, I guess what I meant was I love HEARING acid house music, but I hate 'official' revivals that the press/style arses get hold of and abuse. I love the old school nights as well, but to be honest I'd hate it if loads of kids started wearing the old kind of dress, I just think 'get a new

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
if 1000's of them think is the best thing that they have ever heard and start wearing bright coloured hooded tops and pom pom hats, dungarees and timberland and shouting Accciiieeedd!!! at the tops of there voice, and carry it on for a year or two, then maybe. maybe, that's when Acid House

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Peter Leidy
that's the stupid thing about revivals - it's very contrived, like the recent electro revival of the last several years. Why the fashion and focus on those years? To be into the music, why do people feel that they have to dress up in the fashion of the era it was created in? While revivals

Re: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread Matt Hellige
[Peter Leidy [EMAIL PROTECTED]] and if an acid house revival means all the lame-asses around here will start dancing again, then bring it on :)! AMEN. -- Matt Hellige [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://matt.immute.net

RE: (313) and now - a cheeky question (2nd re-post)

2003-06-13 Thread yussel
who's to say that the acid house revival has to be the UK version? On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, rob wrote: The big Issue here is are we in a true state of an Acid House Revival. I don't think so and I don't think we've ever seen one!! I love all of the early 80's work i.e. Detroit Techno,