https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48338
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48338/0001-Ticket-48338-SimplePagedResults-abandon-could-happen.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48340
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48340/0001-Ticket-48340-
Add-basic-monitor-support-to-lib389.patch
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48257
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48257/0001-Ticket-48257-Fix-coverity-issues-08-24-2015.patch
Once this ticket is closed, is it okay to respin nunc_stans which is
going to be version 0.1.6?
Current: rpm/389-ds-base.spec.in:%global
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48335
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48335/0001-Ticket-48335-Add-SASL-support-to-lib389.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Mark Reynolds wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48335
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48335/0001-Ticket-48335-Add-SASL-support-to-lib389.patch
>
> --
> 389-devel mailing list
> 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48339
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48339/0001-Ticket-48339-Share-nsslapd-threadnumber-in-the-case-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48311
This is an additional patch to validate the returns from the original
fix.
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
389-devel mailing list