[389-devel] Re: Logging performance improvement

2016-06-30 Thread William Brown
On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 20:53 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 06/30/2016 08:14 PM, William Brown wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 20:01 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> On 06/30/2016 07:52 PM, William Brown wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I've been thinking about this for a while, so I decided to

[389-devel] Re: Logging performance improvement

2016-06-30 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/30/2016 08:14 PM, William Brown wrote: On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 20:01 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: On 06/30/2016 07:52 PM, William Brown wrote: Hi, I've been thinking about this for a while, so I decided to dump my thoughts to a document. I think I won't get to implementing this for a

[389-devel] Re: Logging performance improvement

2016-06-30 Thread William Brown
On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 20:01 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 06/30/2016 07:52 PM, William Brown wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been thinking about this for a while, so I decided to dump my > > thoughts to a document. I think I won't get to implementing this for a > > while, but it would really help

[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

2016-06-30 Thread William Brown
On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 14:53 -0700, Noriko Hosoi wrote: > On 06/30/2016 12:45 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > > Hi William, > > > > the reason that after a total init the consumer does not have the > > latest state of the supplier RUV and is receiving updates based on the > > RUV at start of the

[389-devel] Re: Logging performance improvement

2016-06-30 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/30/2016 07:52 PM, William Brown wrote: Hi, I've been thinking about this for a while, so I decided to dump my thoughts to a document. I think I won't get to implementing this for a while, but it would really help our server performance.

[389-devel] Logging performance improvement

2016-06-30 Thread William Brown
Hi, I've been thinking about this for a while, so I decided to dump my thoughts to a document. I think I won't get to implementing this for a while, but it would really help our server performance. http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/logging-performance-improvement.html -- Sincerely,

[389-devel] please review: Ticket48907 - admin server - register-ds-admin.pl fails to find local config DS

2016-06-30 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48907 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48907/0001-Ticket-48907-register-ds-admin-fails-to-find-local-c.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

2016-06-30 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
Hi William, the reason that after a total init the consumer does not have the latest state of the supplier RUV and is receiving updates based on the RUV at start of the total init is independent of the modrdn problem. When a supplier is performing a total init it is still accepting changes,