[389-devel] Please Review 50669 - remove nuncstans

2019-10-22 Thread William Brown
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50669 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50670 -- Sincerely, William ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-10-23 - 96% PASS

2019-10-22 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/10/23/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.2-20191022gitabc6f16.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[389-devel] Re: Future of nunc-stans

2019-10-22 Thread Rich Megginson
On 10/22/19 8:28 PM, William Brown wrote: I think turbo mode was to try and shortcut returning to the conntable and then having the blocking on the connections poll because the locking strategies before weren't as good. I think there is still some value in turbo "for now" but if we can bring

[389-devel] Please review: 50667 dsctl -l to use paths.

2019-10-22 Thread William Brown
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50668 -- Sincerely, William ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: