https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/12/11/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.4-2.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
> On 10 Dec 2019, at 19:15, thierry bordaz wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
> Thanks for these very interesting results.
> It would help if you can provide the stap scripts to make sure what you are
> accounting the latency.
Yes, I plan to put them into a PR soon once I have done a bit more data
> On 11 Dec 2019, at 02:20, Howard Chu wrote:
>
> 389-devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
>> My next steps from here will be:
>>
>> * To add USDT probes to the logs and back_ldbm to get better, fine detail
>> about what is causing the excessive latency.
>> * these probes are
389-devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> My next steps from here will be:
>
> * To add USDT probes to the logs and back_ldbm to get better, fine detail
> about what is causing the excessive latency.
> * these probes are also needed to resolve what appears to be a symbol
>
Hi William,
Thanks for these very interesting results.
It would help if you can provide the stap scripts to make sure what you
are accounting the latency.
Also just to be sure is latency a synonym for response time ?
Regarding the comparison (tail) 1client/16client. It looks to me that
the
