https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/10/15/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20201014git7fd97b1.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi everyone,
I'm once again here to bring up my favourite topic, of rust-in-ds. Slow and
steady progress has been made, and it would be good to update the situation
here.
Completed Items are:
>> - william -> fix the intentional name leak in the rust slapi plugin
>> interface to use
This has come up because there is a set of customer cases where they have
configured it incorrectly, due to bugs in lib389. The issues in lib389 arise
from a lack of validation/constraint in the checking of the
nsslapd-parent-suffix value in the server, allowing the client to create
invalid
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4378
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi,
you are right that it is possible to configure suffix hierarchies which
are broken, but in my experience this wasn't an issue. people using sub
suffixes did get it right.
So is there really a need to change something that is working for a long
time ?
Regards,
Ludwig
On 14.10.20
https://github.com/mreynolds389/389wiki/pull/48
This is a draft design, and probably of interest to thierry whom I discussed
this with last night :)
Thanks!
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs, Australia
