On 07/10/2017 12:13 AM, William Brown wrote:
On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 11:44 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 07/07/2017 10:44 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 07/07/2017 07:10 AM, William Brown wrote:
Any thoughts or objections on the above would be welcome.
The only problem with going to a
On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 11:44 +0200, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> On 07/07/2017 10:44 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> >
> > On 07/07/2017 07:10 AM, William Brown wrote:
> >> Any thoughts or objections on the above would be welcome.
> > The only problem with going to a queue is if the server goes
On 07/07/2017 03:17 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 07/07/2017 04:44 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 07/07/2017 07:10 AM, William Brown wrote:
Any thoughts or objections on the above would be welcome.
The only problem with going to a queue is if the server goes down
unexpectedly. In such a
On 07/07/2017 04:44 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
> On 07/07/2017 07:10 AM, William Brown wrote:
>> Any thoughts or objections on the above would be welcome.
> The only problem with going to a queue is if the server goes down
> unexpectedly. In such a case those RI updates would be
On 07/07/2017 10:44 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 07/07/2017 07:10 AM, William Brown wrote:
Any thoughts or objections on the above would be welcome.
The only problem with going to a queue is if the server goes down
unexpectedly. In such a case those RI updates would be lost.
We already
On 07/07/2017 07:10 AM, William Brown wrote:
Any thoughts or objections on the above would be welcome.
The only problem with going to a queue is if the server goes down
unexpectedly. In such a case those RI updates would be lost.
We already have this issue because there is a delay between
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts or objections on the above would be welcome.
> >> The only problem with going to a queue is if the server goes down
> >> unexpectedly. In such a case those RI updates would be lost.
> > We already have this issue because there is a delay between the change
> > to the
On 07/06/2017 08:13 PM, William Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 14:33 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>> On 07/06/2017 01:07 PM, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> A desire had been expressed to get rid of referint plugin's logfile:
>>> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49202
>>>
>>> It
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 14:33 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
> On 07/06/2017 01:07 PM, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > A desire had been expressed to get rid of referint plugin's logfile:
> > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49202
> >
> > It finally turns out that this file is used for
On 07/06/2017 01:07 PM, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A desire had been expressed to get rid of referint plugin's logfile:
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49202
>
> It finally turns out that this file is used for other purposes than
> real logging.
>
> The referint plugin currently
10 matches
Mail list logo
