[389-devel] Re: Implementing Referential Integrity by using a queue instead of a file

2017-07-07 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 07/07/2017 03:17 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 07/07/2017 04:44 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: On 07/07/2017 07:10 AM, William Brown wrote: Any thoughts or objections on the above would be welcome. The only problem with going to a queue is if the server goes down unexpectedly. In such a

[389-devel] Re: Implementing Referential Integrity by using a queue instead of a file

2017-07-07 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 07/07/2017 04:44 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > > On 07/07/2017 07:10 AM, William Brown wrote: >> Any thoughts or objections on the above would be welcome. > The only problem with going to a queue is if the server goes down > unexpectedly. In such a case those RI updates would be

[389-devel] Re: Implementing Referential Integrity by using a queue instead of a file

2017-07-07 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 07/07/2017 10:44 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: On 07/07/2017 07:10 AM, William Brown wrote: Any thoughts or objections on the above would be welcome. The only problem with going to a queue is if the server goes down unexpectedly. In such a case those RI updates would be lost. We already

[389-devel] Re: Implementing Referential Integrity by using a queue instead of a file

2017-07-07 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 07/07/2017 07:10 AM, William Brown wrote: Any thoughts or objections on the above would be welcome. The only problem with going to a queue is if the server goes down unexpectedly. In such a case those RI updates would be lost. We already have this issue because there is a delay between