[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49669 - Invalid cachememsize can crash server during offline restore

2018-05-14 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49669 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49688 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49684 - AC_PROG_CC clobbers CFLAGS set by --enable-debug

2018-05-14 Thread Viktor Ashirov
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49684 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49686 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fe

[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49685 - make clean fails if cargo is not installed

2018-05-14 Thread Viktor Ashirov
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49685 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49687 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fe

[389-devel] Re: lib389 usage cheatsheet

2018-05-14 Thread William Brown
> On 14 May 2018, at 18:26, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > >> On Mon, May 14 2018 at 13:16:02 +1000, William Brown >> wrote: >>> On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 09:41 +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote: >>> Hi Thierry, >>> I agree with you, it was exactly my proposition :) >>> >>> Keeping main python-ldap elements

[389-devel] Re: Please review: Issue 49581 - Fix dynamic plugins test suite

2018-05-14 Thread Simon Pichugin
Fixed the issues Viktor has reported. Please, review. On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:25:35PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:17:06PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote: > > Hi team, > > please review a PR for dynamic plugins test suite fix. > > > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/iss

[389-devel] Re: lib389 usage cheatsheet

2018-05-14 Thread Viktor Ashirov
On Mon, May 14 2018 at 13:16:02 +1000, William Brown wrote: > On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 09:41 +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote: >> Hi Thierry, >> I agree with you, it was exactly my proposition :) >> >> Keeping main python-ldap elements is important because we don't want >> to implement or mask/wrap this