> On 28 Feb 2019, at 01:06, Matus Honek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:10 AM Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/26/2019 04:42 PM, Matus Honek wrote:
>>> This kinda leads me to thinking we should implement ACIs management
>>> within the DSLdapObjects like this (probably specific to a
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:10 AM Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>
>
> On 02/26/2019 04:42 PM, Matus Honek wrote:
> > This kinda leads me to thinking we should implement ACIs management
> > within the DSLdapObjects like this (probably specific to a particular
> > subclass, to a degree). One that would take
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:21:50 -0700
> From: Rich Megginson
> Message-ID:
> On 2/26/19 4:26 PM, William Brown wrote:
>>> I think the recursive/nested transaction on the database level are not the
>>> problem, we do this correctly already, either all or no change becomes
>>> persistent.
>>>
On 02/26/2019 04:42 PM, Matus Honek wrote:
This kinda leads me to thinking we should implement ACIs management
within the DSLdapObjects like this (probably specific to a particular
subclass, to a degree). One that would take care of this added
requirement for objectclass ACIs because of hidden .
