[389-devel] Please review: filter optimisation

2019-05-06 Thread William Brown
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50252 -- Sincerely, William ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.or

[389-devel] Re: Groups are not accessible by filter

2019-05-06 Thread Anuj Borah
Ok, I will check. Thanks On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 8:21 AM William Brown wrote: > > > On 7 May 2019, at 11:31, Anuj Borah wrote: > > > > @William Brown > > > > Actually my concern was as bellow: > > > > topo.standalone.search_s(DEFAULT_SUFFIX, ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE, F4, ['cn', > 'cn', 'cn']) > > >>[

[389-devel] Re: Groups are not accessible by filter

2019-05-06 Thread William Brown
> On 7 May 2019, at 11:31, Anuj Borah wrote: > > @William Brown > > Actually my concern was as bellow: > > topo.standalone.search_s(DEFAULT_SUFFIX, ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE, F4, ['cn', 'cn', > 'cn']) > >>[dn: uid=bhall,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com > cn: Benjamin Hall > > ] > > Question: Can we u

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-05-07 - 88% PASS

2019-05-06 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/05/07/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.2-20190506git8046842.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.

[389-devel] Re: Groups are not accessible by filter

2019-05-06 Thread Anuj Borah
@William Brown Actually my concern was as bellow: topo.standalone.search_s(DEFAULT_SUFFIX, ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE, F4, ['cn', 'cn', 'cn']) >>[dn: uid=bhall,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com cn: Benjamin Hall ] Question: Can we use these filter directly in filter module. --->> like Accounts().filter(F

[389-devel] Re: Groups are not accessible by filter

2019-05-06 Thread William Brown
You are missing a key part of the question again: "Is there any chance we can use these filters TO GET lib389 objects of the type X". So for example: > On 3 May 2019, at 17:12, Anuj Borah wrote: > > @William Brown > > Are there any chance we can use these filter with filter module directly .