-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/23/2015 01:38 AM, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi Nathan, Hi Mark, Hi team,
>
> as I know, we've decided to make me "gatekeeper" of QE team for
> managing lib389 and DS git repos.
>
> Can you please update the status of this situation?
>
>
On 09/12/2014 12:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47892/0001-Ticket-47892-coverity-defects-found-in-1.3.3.1.patch
ACK.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
On 04/03/2014 08:13 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47492/0001-Ticket-47492-PassSync-removes-User-must-change-passw.3.patch
Ack
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47752
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47752/0001-Ticket-47752-Don-t-add-unhashed-password-mod-if-we-d.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 01/16/2014 03:14 PM, Deas, Jim wrote:
Rich,
Thanks. I actually did have the address of operator on the code. Both
the init and config are defining only a couple of specific functions
(start_fn, pre_results_fn,pre_abandon_fn) one function defined for each.
The one I am testing is
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47525
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47525/0001-Ticket-47525-Don-t-modify-preop-entry-in-memberOf-co.patch
The previous fix for this issue was causing a crash in one of the
in-tree tests. This patch addresses the crash.
--
389-devel mailing
On 12/12/2013 04:08 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47525
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47525/0001-Ticket-47525-Don-t-modify-preop-entry-in-memberOf-co.patch
The previous fix for this issue was causing a crash in one of the
in-tree tests
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47565
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47565/0001-Ticket-47565-Content-Sync-update-file-needs-extensib.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
I just pushed the following patch under the trivial fix rule to
address these warnings. This should make the Jenkins jobs green again.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47569/0001-Ticket-47569-Fix-build-warnings.patch
On 10/22/2013 05:32 PM, nkin...@redhat.com wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47513
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47513/0001-Ticket-47513-tmpfiles.d-references-var-lock-when-the.2.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 10/09/2013 01:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
In the interest of reducing the autotool file churn, is everyone ok
with switching to using F19 to run autogen?
Ack. If we want to enforce that for master, we could update the version
checks in autogen.sh to require the F19 versions as a minimum.
Hi,
I made some modifications to our Jenkins jobs which affect the e-mails
that are sent to this list when encountering a build failure. Last
week, I had changed the e-mails to include the entire build logs for
failed builds as a convenience (no need to go to the Jenkins URL to see
why the
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47539
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47539/0001-Ticket-47539-Disabling-DNA-plug-in-throws-error-53.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
, sync_util.c:251,
sync_util.c:544, sync_util.c:608, sync_util.c:682, and result.c:294.
If you address the above issues, I'm OK with you pushing it to the repo.
Thanks,
-NGK
Regards,
Ludwig
On 08/30/2013 05:00 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 08/30/2013 05:06 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hello,
I
FYI - Please ignore these failures, as I manually triggered them to fail
in my Jenkins build environment.
As you can see from these reports, we now have a Jenkins system set up
to perform Continuous Integration builds of the main 389 DS code
(389-ds-base) on Debian 7.1 (Wheezy). These builds
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/449
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/449/0001-Ticket-449-Allow-macro-aci-keywords-to-be-case-insen.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ACK.
On 08/16/2013 09:55 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47467
These patches improve the Add CRL/CKL Console dialog. Changes were
needed in Admin Server for the security CGI error messages, IDM Console
Framework for the dialog improvements, and Admin Console for the online
help page. I've included screenshots
Hi,
These patches add new UI to the certificate request wizard in Console
that allows the key size and signing algorithms to be selected. It also
improves the defaults if an older Console is used against an Admin
Server with these changes. Changes were required to Admin Server for
the CGI
From 52fb682ceb0b1f03de26b6f9d56a8ee2476d9422 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:34:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add git commit hash to developer rpm build names
We need to set the srcdir variable in order for the most recent
git hash
On 04/19/2013 12:04 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 04/19/2013 12:54 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
Hi,
Please review the attached patch that adds the ability for convenient
developer RPM builds. Details are in the patch description.
Note that my patch does not include any changes that will be made
On 04/19/2013 12:51 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 04/19/2013 01:21 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 04/19/2013 12:04 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 04/19/2013 12:54 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
Hi,
Please review the attached patch that adds the ability for
convenient developer RPM builds. Details
just to build the Makefile. More details are in the patch
description.
Thanks,
-NGK
From c996ae334e7a27843549318b3a970c995d58f5b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:10:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Allow rpm builds to be run without configure
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47334
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47334/0001-Ticket-47334-Avoid-quoting-all-settings-in-console.c.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hi,
I have set up a nightly development yum repository for 389 Directory
Server builds from master. There are currently builds available for
Fedora 18 (x86_64 and i686). I will work on adding builds for rawhide
(F19) in the near future. New builds are made nightly from the master
branch
On 11/29/2012 06:49 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
On 11/29/2012 03:37 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 11/29/2012 08:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
I found an older post by KurtZeilenga:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html
and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15.
On 05/04/2012 10:45 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 05/04/2012 11:25 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
This came up during extended testing for
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/355
steps:
1) make a ds user and an ad user that are in sync - verify ad changes
go to ds and vice versa
2) move the ad
On 03/07/2012 07:41 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 03/07/2012 07:53 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
An additional fix is needed for this issue. Your patch fixed the
dna_pre_op() function, but the same issue exists in the
dna_be_txn_pre_op() function. The attached patch takes care of this.
ack
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/181
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/181/0001-ticket-181-Allow-PAM-passthru-plug-in-to-have-multip.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 01/20/2012 07:02 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 11/16/2011 08:48 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 11/16/2011 06:38 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 11/15/2011 10:29 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 11/15/2011 01:12 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 10/10/2011 10:08 AM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Reduce the number of DN normalization
. Replacing SLAPI_TARGET_DN with SLAPI_TARGET_SDN (also its macros,
e.g., SLAPI_SEARCH_TARGET_SDN and SLAPI_ADD_TARGET_SDN).
I haven't reviewed the entire patch yet, but I am concerned about
changing the APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730387
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=518567action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729717
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517697action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728510
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517698action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
On 06/27/2011 12:03 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
This is needed to build in Fedora rawhide
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ack
On 06/20/2011 06:25 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710377
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=502880action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703530
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=498086action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702705
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497407action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497416action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=497429action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700875
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=495819action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697641
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=492996action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=493023action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=493032action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690649
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=487435action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689952
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486894action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688341
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=485829action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=485851action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=486043action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616707
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=483545action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493424
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480295action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675853
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=477699action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670616
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=476468action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527912
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474563action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661102
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=472276action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
You might want to check if you can just use slapi_is_encoded() instead
of parsing for the storage scheme yourself.
-NGK
On 01/05/2011 06:00 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653007
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=471975action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578863
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=405422action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=405422action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 03/30/2010 03:44 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Nathan Kinder wrote:
New patch attached.
Nice!
Thanks for the review!
mep.c:491 - value is not freed if it is not a valid filter - also would
be nice to have the error message print value to show what the bogus
filter
From 07346383364e6a3e37d8b2f44b305a70db26ba3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:14:54 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Make check for threaded httpd work with Apache 2.0
The check we use for a threaded httpd doesn't properly detect a
threaded Apache
58 matches
Mail list logo
