[389-devel] Re: Removal of mempool experimental

On 05/08/2017 11:11 PM, William Brown wrote: Hi, Unless there are objections in the next 24 hours, I'm removing the mempool experimental code as it is not used. No objections. Please go ahead. --noriko Thanks, ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-d

[389-devel] Re: Review process suggestion

On 03/20/2017 02:47 AM, William Brown wrote: Hi all, I've noticed that sometimes during the review process that the following happens: Europe Afternoon: code is posted to review. America Morning: code is acked Europe Afternoon: code is merged Australian Morning: "I have this comment, but the c

[389-devel] Re: Discuss: local vs remote be flag

Thank you, William! On 02/27/2017 03:35 PM, William Brown wrote: On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 12:23 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote: Hi William, A couple of questions (as usual... :) On 02/26/2017 03:51 PM, William Brown wrote: Hi, I think that we should have a flag of a backend as local or remote for

[389-devel] Re: Discuss: local vs remote be flag

Hi William, A couple of questions (as usual... :) On 02/26/2017 03:51 PM, William Brown wrote: Hi, I think that we should have a flag of a backend as local or remote for DS. Does the remote backend mean the referral and/or the chaining backend? Or could there be more? The reason for this is

[389-devel] Re: Q. on lib389 Re: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

On 02/13/2017 08:51 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (13/02/17 08:38), Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 02/12/2017 06:14 PM, William Brown wrote: On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 17:42 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 02/12/2017 03:51 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49121 https://pagure.io

[389-devel] Another Q. on pagure issue page: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

Hi, it might be a known issue, but ... When we have multiple links in, e.g., rhbz, what is the right way to list them? Separated with ' ' does not work. It's considered one url, instead of 2, and it does not jump to the bug by clicking it... ***rhbz* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

[389-devel] Re: Q. on lib389 Re: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

On 02/12/2017 06:14 PM, William Brown wrote: On Sun, 2017-02-12 at 17:42 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 02/12/2017 03:51 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49121 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files

[389-devel] Q. on lib389 Re: Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

On 02/12/2017 03:51 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49121 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/d857ff4919940bcebeae870774896783f7b6e86ce08a2c2e924610ac2335f8de-0001-Ticket-49121-ns-slapd-crashes-in-ldif_sput-due-to-th.patch These odd » characters are shown

[389-devel] Please review: #49121 ns-slapd crashes in ldif_sput due to the output buf size is less than the real size.

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49121 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/d857ff4919940bcebeae870774896783f7b6e86ce08a2c2e924610ac2335f8de-0001-Ticket-49121-ns-slapd-crashes-in-ldif_sput-due-to-th.patch These odd » characters are shown at some part of the patch. I wonder what cau

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #49104: dbscan-bin crashing due to a segmentation fault.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49104 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49104/0001-Ticket-49104-dbscan-bin-crashing-due-to-a-segmentati.patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49104/0002-Ticket-49104-Add-CI-test.patch git patch file (master) -- CI test https://fedo

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #49088: 389-ds-base rpm postinstall script bugs

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49088 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49088/0001-Ticket-49088-389-ds-base-rpm-postinstall-script-bugs.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email t

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #49080: shadowExpire should not be a calculated value; #49082: Fix password expiration related shadow attributes

Thanks to Gordon Messmer for reporting the bugs and providing the original patches. His patches are slightly modified to fix compiler warnings, etc. https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49080 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49080/0001-Ticket-49080-shadowExpire-should-not-be-a-ca

[389-devel] Re: Urgent review: 49041 ssl fails to start on f24

On 11/17/2016 12:25 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 11/17/2016 11:22 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote: Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 11/17/2016 06:36 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote: William Brown wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49041 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket

[389-devel] Re: Urgent review: 49041 ssl fails to start on f24

On 11/17/2016 11:22 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote: Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 11/17/2016 06:36 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote: William Brown wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49041 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49041/0001-Ticket-49041-SSL-fails-to-start-due-to-NSS-db-versio.patch

[389-devel] Re: Urgent review: 49041 ssl fails to start on f24

On 11/17/2016 06:36 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote: William Brown wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49041 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49041/0001-Ticket-49041-SSL-fails-to-start-due-to-NSS-db-versio.patch I think this should be reviewed urgently and backported. This can ca

[389-devel] Re: Please review design proposal for tickets 47986 and 48976

Hi Ludwig, On 09/29/2016 05:43 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: This is the initial proposal, thanks for your feedback http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/delay-accepting-updates-after-init.html Please help me understanding the design... I'm having a bit hard time to figure out the relatio

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48988: ds_removal and ds_unregister should support prompting for password

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48988 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48988/0001-Ticket-48988-ds_removal-and-ds_unregister-should-sup.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: Please review: Fix warnings Wstrict prototypes

On 09/04/2016 07:12 PM, William Brown wrote: On Sat, 2016-09-03 at 18:07 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: ehlo, https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48979 The 1st 16 patches are preparation for a last huge patch which uses "(void)" for functions which does not expect any arguments. I have tested

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48969: nsslapd-auditfaillog always has an explicit path

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48969 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48969/0001-Ticket-48969-nsslapd-auditfaillog-always-has-an-expl.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48967: passwordMinAge attribute doesn't limit the minimum age of the password

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48967 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48967/0001-Ticket-48967-passwordMinAge-attribute-doesn-t-limit-.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48943: When fine-grained policy is applied, a sub-tree has a priority over a user while changing password

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48943 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48943/0001-Ticket-48943-When-fine-grained-policy-is-applied-a-s.patch Note: Once this patch is applied, the test case provided by Simon passes. *Attachment* /0001-Ticket-48943-Add-CI-Test-for-the-password-t

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48936: Duplicate collation entries

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48936 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48936/0001-Ticket-48936-Duplicate-collation-entries.patch git patch file (master) -- revised based upon the comment by Rich (Thanks!) -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48936: Duplicate collation entries

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48936 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48936/0001-Ticket-48936-Duplicate-collation-entries.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48940: DS logs have warning:ancestorid not indexed

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48940 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48940/0001-Ticket-48940-DS-logs-have-warning-ancestorid-not-ind.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48934: remove-ds.pl deletes an instance even if wrong prefix was specified

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48934 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48934/0001-Ticket-48934-remove-ds.pl-deletes-an-instance-even-i.patch Special thanks to Simon Pichugin for the bug report with the idea how to fix it. -- 389-devel mailing list

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48939: nsslapd-workingdir is empty when ns-slapd is started by systemd

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48939 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48939/0001-Ticket-48939-nsslapd-workingdir-is-empty-when-ns-sla.2.patch Description: Thanks to tbor...@redhat.com for suggesting to reset the working dir in the error cases. I've added more error checks and

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48939: nsslapd-workingdir is empty when ns-slapd is started by systemd

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48939 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48939/0001-Ticket-48939-nsslapd-workingdir-is-empty-when-ns-sla.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48933: drop support for legacy replication - need to clean code

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48933 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48933/0001-Ticket-48933-drop-support-for-legacy-replication-nee.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #47413: 389-admin fails to build with latest httpd

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47413 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47413/0001-Ticket-47413-389-admin-fails-to-build-with-latest-ht.2.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48914: db2bak.pl task enters infinitive loop when bak fs is almost full

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48914 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48914/0001-Ticket-48914-db2bak.pl-task-enters-infinitive-loop-w.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

UFFIX now cn=child,cn=paren,$SUFFIX will be sent before its parent I do not know how we can fix this, I think it is a corner case, but we should keep it in mind Ludwig On 06/30/2016 11:53 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 06/30/2016 12:45 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi William, the reason that aft

[389-devel] Re: Replication after full online init

On 06/30/2016 12:45 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi William, the reason that after a total init the consumer does not have the latest state of the supplier RUV and is receiving updates based on the RUV at start of the total init is independent of the modrdn problem. When a supplier is performi

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48904: syncrepl search returning error 329; plugin sending a bad error code

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48904 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48904/0001-Ticket-48904-syncrepl-search-returning-error-329-plu.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48899: Values of dbcachetries/dbcachehits in cn=monitor could overflow.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48899 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48899/0001-Ticket-48899-Values-of-dbcachetries-dbcachehits-in-c.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review (take ? :): [389 Project] #48755: moving an entry could make the online init fail

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48755 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48755/0001-Ticket-48755-moving-an-entry-could-make-the-online-i.2.patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48755/0001-Ticket-48755-moving-an-entry-could-make-the-online-i.3.patch git patch file (m

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48896: Default Setting for passwordMinTokenLength does not work

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48896 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48896/0001-Ticket-48896-Default-Setting-for-passwordMinTokenLen.patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48896/0002-Ticket-48896-CI-test-test-case-for-ticket-48896.patch -- 389-devel mailing list

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48892: Wrong result code display in audit-failure log

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48892 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48892/0001-Ticket-48892-Wrong-result-code-display-in-audit-fail.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: Please review (additional fixes): [389 Project] #48755: moving an entry could make the online init fail

On 06/20/2016 02:20 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: I have a question about your tombstone entry... You are using entrydn instead of entryrdn? no, sorry for the confusion, I was using ldapsearch to get teh tombstones, not dbscan Hmmm, if that's the case, I need to learn why you don't have the paren

[389-devel] Re: Please review (additional fixes): [389 Project] #48755: moving an entry could make the online init fail

On 06/17/2016 08:49 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: On 06/17/2016 05:31 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: On 06/17/2016 12:17 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi Noriko, I still have a doubt on your fix. You now base the entries to be sent only on the parentid index, but when creating a tombstone, the entry is

[389-devel] Re: Please review (additional fixes): [389 Project] #48755: moving an entry could make the online init fail

On 06/17/2016 06:01 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: On 06/17/2016 02:36 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote: On 06/17/2016 08:42 AM, Martin Babinsky wrote: On 06/17/2016 03:05 AM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48755 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48755/0001-Ticket

[389-devel] Re: Please review (additional fixes): [389 Project] #48755: moving an entry could make the online init fail

Continue looking into it... Thanks, --noriko Ludwig On 06/17/2016 03:05 AM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48755 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48755/0001-Ticket-48755-moving-an-entry-could-make-the-online-i.3.patch git patch file (master) -- additiona

[389-devel] Please review (additional fixes): [389 Project] #48755: moving an entry could make the online init fail

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48755 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48755/0001-Ticket-48755-moving-an-entry-could-make-the-online-i.3.patch git patch file (master) -- additional fix to the server patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48755/0002-Ticket-48755-CI

[389-devel] Please review: 3 tickets 48234, 48848, and 48833

*https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48234* #48234: "matching rules" in ACI's "bind rules not fully evaluated https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48234/0001-Ticket-48234-matching-rules-in-ACI-s-bind-rules-not-.patch git patch file (master) https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticke

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48848: modrdn deleteoldrdn can fail to find old attribute value, perhaps due to case folding

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48848 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48848/0001-Ticket-48848-modrdn-deleteoldrdn-can-fail-to-find-ol.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Verified: Re: Q. on RDN with CES type

I verified the behavior. Our dn normalization has a problem for CES types. --noriko On 06/06/2016 02:52 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: Hello, I'm working on this ticket 48848. Fixing the ticket itself is easy (please see the proposed patch). https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48848 T

[389-devel] Q. on RDN with CES type

Hello, I'm working on this ticket 48848. Fixing the ticket itself is easy (please see the proposed patch). https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48848 Ticket #48848 - modrdn deleteoldrdn can fail to find old attribute value, perhaps due to case fold

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #47911: split out snmp agent into a subpackage

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47911 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47911/0001-Ticket-47911-split-out-snmp-agent-into-a-subpackageT.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: Please review/comment: [389 Project] #48833: 389 showing inconsistent values for shadowMax and shadowWarning in 1.3.5.1

Thanks for your comments, William. On 05/31/2016 07:22 PM, William Brown wrote: On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 17:48 -0700, Noriko Hosoi wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48833 There are 2 proposals. I'd like to have your thoughts which one would be preferable. https://fedorahosted.or

[389-devel] Please review/comment: [389 Project] #48833: 389 showing inconsistent values for shadowMax and shadowWarning in 1.3.5.1

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48833 There are 2 proposals. I'd like to have your thoughts which one would be preferable. https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48833/0001-Ticket-48833-389-showing-inconsistent-values-for-sha.2.patch git patch file (master) -- second proposal -- t

[389-devel] Please comment: [389 Project] #48404: /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libnunc-stans.so is owned by both -libs and -devel

William raised a good point in fixing this ticket #48404. We have *.so and *.so.* (*.so # & *.so.#.#.#) for libraries. I assumed *.so should be in 389-ds-base-devel and *.so.* should be in 389-ds-base-libs. But it is not needed to be like that? He proposed to put all the .so and .so.* files

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48854: Running db2index with no options breaks replication

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48854 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48854/0001-Ticket-48854-Running-db2index-with-no-options-breaks.patch It turned out it was a real bug in import_foreman which was not adjusted when the backend RUV entry was redesigned... -- 389-devel mail

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48755: moving an entry could make the online init fail

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48755 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48755/0001-Ticket-48755-moving-an-entry-could-make-the-online-i.2.patch git patch file (master) -- eliminated a config param nsds5SortedTotalUpdate Changes made since the previous patch . a config param nsds

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48834: Modifier's name is not recorded in the audit log with modrdn and moddn operations

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48834 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48834/0001-Ticket-48834-Modifier-s-name-is-not-recorded-in-the-.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48755: moving an entry could make the online init fail

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48755 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48755/0001-Ticket-48755-moving-an-entry-could-make-the-online-i.patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48755/0002-Ticket-48755-CI-test-test-case-for-ticket-48755.patch -- 389-devel mailing list

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48833: 389 showing inconsistent values for shadowMax and shadowWarning in 1.3.5.1

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48833 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48833/0001-Ticket-48833-389-showing-inconsistent-values-for-sha.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48837: Replication: total init aborted

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48837 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48837/0001-Ticket-48837-Replication-total-init-aborted.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48816: (1.2.11 only) add a nsTLS1.0 on or off new configuration parameter to cn=encryption, cn=config in RHEL 6 389-ds-base

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48816 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48816/0001-Ticket-48816-1.2.11-only-add-a-nsTLS1.0-on-or-off-ne.3.patch git patch file (master) -- revised based upon the comments by William and Ludwig (Thanks!) -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.f

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48811: Console window could be hidden after login via consoles on multiple hosts

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48811 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48811/0001-Ticket-48811-Console-window-could-be-hidden-after-lo.patch git patch file (idm-console-framework master) -- take 2; tested by Viktor (Thanks!!) -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedorapro

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48144: Add /usr/sbin/status-dirsrv script to get the status of the directory server instance.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48144 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0001-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-script-to-ge.2.patch git patch file (master) -- additional enhancement for the exit code -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://l

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48822: (389-ds-base-1.3.5) Fixing coverity issues.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48822 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48822/0001-Ticket-48822-389-ds-base-1.3.5-Fixing-coverity-issue.patch git patch file (master) -- DEADCODE https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48822/0002-Ticket-48822-389-ds-base-1.3.5-Fixing-co

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48816: (1.2.11 only) add a nsTLS1.0 on or off new configuration parameter to cn=encryption, cn=config in RHEL 6 389-ds-base

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48816 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48816/0001-Ticket-48816-1.2.11-only-add-a-nsTLS1.0-on-or-off-ne.patch Note: the patch for the schema 01core389.ldif will be applied to master not to break the configuration when upgraded. -- 389-devel mail

[389-devel] Please review (resent): [389 Project] #48808: Paged results search returns the blank list of entries

On 04/28/2016 12:12 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48808 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48808/0001-Ticket-48808-Paged-results-search-returns-the-blank-.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48811: Console window could be hidden after login via consoles on multiple hosts

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48811 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48811/0001-Ticket-48811-Console-window-could-be-hidden-after-lo.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48808: Paged results search returns the blank list of entries

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48808 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48808/0001-Ticket-48808-Paged-results-search-returns-the-blank-.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48429: running remove-ds-admin.pl multiple times will make it so you cannot install DS

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/4842 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48429/0001-Ticket-48429-running-remove-ds-admin.pl-multiple-tim.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48410: Unable to remove / unregister a DS instance from admin server

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48410 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48410/0001-Ticket-48410-389-admin-Unable-to-remove-unregister-a.patch git patch file (389-admin master) https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48410/0001-Ticket-48410-389-ds-base-Unable-to-remove-unr

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48409: RHDS upgrade change Ownership of certificate files upon upgrade.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48409 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48409/0001-Ticket-48409-RHDS-upgrade-change-Ownership-of-certif.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48802: Compilation warnings from clang

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48802 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48802/0001-Ticket-48802-Compilation-warnings-from-clang.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: ticket 47536, 48800, and 48784

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47536 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47536/0001-Ticket-47536-Allow-usage-of-OpenLDAP-libraries-that-.patch git patch file (master) -- another revision -- instead of checking with "OpenSSL", check with "Not MozNSS" for non-Fedora/RHEL platforms;

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48799: objectclass values could be dropped on the consumer

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48799 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48799/0001-Ticket-48799-objectclass-values-could-be-dropped-on-.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review (take n+1): [389 Project] #47536: Allow usage of OpenLDAP libraries that don't use NSS for crypto

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47536 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47536/0001-Ticket-47536-Allow-usage-of-OpenLDAP-libraries-that-.patch git patch file (master) -- another revision -- instead of checking with "OpenSSL", check with "Not MozNSS" for non-Fedora/RHEL platforms

[389-devel] Re: Please review, svrcore fix coverity issues 6 through 10

On 04/11/2016 10:30 PM, William Brown wrote: https://pagure.io/svrcore/pull-request/11 Patch bundle to fix coverity issues discovered during build processes. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Maybe, i

[389-devel] Please review: 3 tickets -- #47536, #48492, #48784

1. https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47536 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47536/0001-Ticket-47536-Allow-usage-of-OpenLDAP-libraries-that-.patch git patch file (master) https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47536/0002-Ticket-47536-CI-test-added-test-cases-for

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48492: heap corruption at schema replication.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48492 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48492/0001-Ticket-48492-heap-corruption-at-schema-replication.2.patch git patch file (master) -- additinal fixes for the crash and better nsslapd-enquote-sup-oc support The previous patch did not solve a c

[389-devel] Please review (Take 2): [389 Project] #48784: Make the SSL version set to the client library configurable.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48784 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48784/0001-Ticket-48784-Make-the-SSL-version-set-to-the-client-.patch git patch file (master) -- revised based upon the reviews by William (Thanks!) * Fixed a typo in an error message. * Changed the retu

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48775: If nsSSL3 is on, even if SSL v3 is not really enabled, a confusing message is logged.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48775 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48775/0001-Ticket-48775-If-nsSSL3-is-on-even-if-SSL-v3-is-not-r.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48784: Make the SSL version set to the client library configurable.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48784 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48784/0001-Ticket-48784-Make-the-SSL-version-set-to-the-client-.patch git patch file (master) -- revised based upon the reviews by William (Thanks!) -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48779: Remove startpidfile check in start-dirsrv

https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48779 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48779/0001-Ticket-48779-Remove-startpidfile-check-in-start-dirs.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #47536: Allow usage of OpenLDAP libraries that don't use NSS for crypto

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47536 Patch: https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47536/0001-Ticket-47536-Allow-usage-of-OpenLDAP-libraries-that-.patch CI test patch: https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47536/0002-Ticket-47536-CI-test-added-test-cases-for-ticket-475.patc

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48492: heap corruption at schema replication.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48492 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48492/0001-Ticket-48492-heap-corruption-at-schema-replication.3.patch git patch file (master) -- revised so that the nsslapd-enquote-sup-oc info is passed to openldap parser. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-d

[389-devel] Please advice: [389 Project] #48760: NSS -- switching to the sql db

Hello, We hear quite often that the key/cert db's RHDS is using are in the old format and have been suggested to switch to the sql db. It turned out it is quite easy although there is one minor issue I described in the comment in the patch *[*]*. But as long as we use "sql:path" to access th

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48757: License tag does not match actual license of code

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48757 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48757/0001-Ticket-48757-License-tag-does-not-match-actual-licen.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: [389-commits] wrappers/systemd.template.service.in

On 02/29/2016 11:01 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (29/02/16 18:43), Noriko Hosoi wrote: wrappers/systemd.template.service.in |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 1e2cfe2ea4ebc7ac31f292bf0076cc1befd15a78 Author: Viktor Ashirov Date: Mon Feb 29 19:07:12

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48492: heap corruption at schema replication.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48492 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48492/0001-Ticket-48492-heap-corruption-at-schema-replication.2.patch git patch file (master) -- ignore nsslapd-enquote-sup-oc -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48662: db2index with no attribute args fail.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48662 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48662/0001-Ticket-48662-db2index-with-no-attribute-args-fail.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48536: Crash in slapi_get_object_extension

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48536 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48536/0001-Ticket-48536-Crash-in-slapi_get_object_extension.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48492: heap corruption at schema replication.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48492 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48492/0001-Ticket-48492-heap-corruption-at-schema-replication.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Please review (take 3): [389 Project] #48144: Add /usr/sbin/status-dirsrv script to get the status of the directory server instance.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48144 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0001-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-script-to-ge.patch git patch file (master) -- revised following the comments by William in #comment:8

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48394: lower password history minimum to 1

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48394 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48394/0001-Ticket-48394-lower-password-history-minimum-to-1.patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48417 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48417/0001-Ticket-48394-ds-console-lower-password-

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48144: Add /usr/sbin/status-dirsrv script to get the status of the directory server instance.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48144 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0001-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-script-to-ge.patch git patch file (master) -- revised based upon the review by mreynolds (Thanks!!) -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http:

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48144: Add /usr/sbin/status-dirsrv script to get the status of the directory server instance.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48144 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0001-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-script-to-ge.patch Note: no need to review this patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48144/0002-Ticket-48144-Add-usr-sbin-status-dirsrv-scri

[389-devel] Please review (additional fix): [389 Project] #548: RFE: Allow AD password sync to update shadowLastChange

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/548 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/548/0001-Ticket-548-RFE-Allow-AD-password-sync-to-update-shad.3.patch git patch file (master) -- additional fix for #comment:19 https://fedorahosted.org/3

[389-devel] Re: Prereview for ticket #48402 , required by ticket #48380 SynRepl does not handle database re-initialization properly

On 01/13/2016 02:34 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 01/13/2016 10:01 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Ticket 48380 requires that sync repl handles database reinitializations properly, to be able to determine if cookies are presented are valid. To achieve this plugins need to be able to detcet if the da

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48406: Avoid self deadlock by PR_Lock(conn->c_mutex)

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48406 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48406/0002-Ticket-48406-Avoid-self-deadlock-by-PR_Lock-conn-c_m.2.patch git patch file (master; take 3) -- replacing PR_Lock/Unlock with PR_EnterMonitor/ExitMonitor, respectively Compared the 3 versions

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #548: RFE: Allow AD password sync to update shadowLastChange

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/548 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/548/0001-Ticket-548-RFE-Allow-AD-password-sync-to-update-shad.2.patch git patch file (master) -- additional fix for the crash bug caused by ldclt. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://list

[389-devel] Please comment (take 2 or take 3): [389 Project] #48406: Avoid self deadlock by PR_Lock(conn->c_mutex)

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48406 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48406/0002-Ticket-48406-Avoid-self-deadlock-by-PR_Lock-conn-c_m.patch git patch file (master; take 2) -- using thread data for managing the lock on conn->c_mutex to make it reentrant https://fedorahosted.o

[389-devel] Please review (take 2): [389 Project] #48406: Avoid self deadlock by PR_Lock(conn->c_mutex)

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48406 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48406/0002-Ticket-48406-Avoid-self-deadlock-by-PR_Lock-conn-c_m.patch git patch file (master; take 2) -- using thread data for managing the lock on conn->c_mutex to make it reentrant Thanks to Rich and Mar

[389-devel] Please review : [389 Project] #48406: Avoid self deadlock by PR_Lock(conn->c_mutex)

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48406 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48338/0001-Revert-Ticket-48338-SimplePagedResults-abandon-could.patch git patch file (master) -- Revert 0001-Ticket-48338-SimplePagedResults? -abandon-co

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48295: Entry cache is not rolled back -- Linked Attributes plug-in - wrong behaviour when adding valid and broken links

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48295 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48295/0001-Ticket-48295-Entry-cache-is-not-rolled-back-Linked-A.patch https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48295/0002-Ticket-48295-CI-test-added-test-cases-for-ticket-482.patch -- 389-devel mailing

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48290 - No man page entry for - option '-u' of dbgen.pl for adding group entries with uniquemembers

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48290 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48290/0001-Ticket-48290-No-man-page-entry-for-option-u-of-dbgen.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >