[389-devel] Re: Replication agreement status messages: JSON or text?

2019-06-12 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 6/12/19 5:48 AM, William Brown wrote: On 12 Jun 2019, at 11:27, thierry bordaz wrote: On 6/12/19 9:22 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi Mark, On 06/11/2019 08:15 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: I am currently working on a revision of replication agreement status messages. Previously we

[389-devel] Re: Replication agreement status messages: JSON or text?

2019-06-12 Thread William Brown
> On 12 Jun 2019, at 11:27, thierry bordaz wrote: > > > > On 6/12/19 9:22 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> On 06/11/2019 08:15 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: >>> I am currently working on a revision of replication agreement status >>> messages. Previously we logged the status like

[389-devel] Re: Replication agreement status messages: JSON or text?

2019-06-12 Thread thierry bordaz
On 6/12/19 9:22 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: Hi Mark, On 06/11/2019 08:15 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: I am currently working on a revision of replication agreement status messages.  Previously we logged the status like so:     Error (%d) - message (sub-message) ... just to get it clear what

[389-devel] Re: Replication agreement status messages: JSON or text?

2019-06-12 Thread William Brown
> On 12 Jun 2019, at 09:22, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > On 06/11/2019 08:15 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: >> I am currently working on a revision of replication agreement status >> messages. Previously we logged the status like so: >> >>Error (%d) - message (sub-message) ... >

[389-devel] Re: Replication agreement status messages: JSON or text?

2019-06-12 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
Hi Mark, On 06/11/2019 08:15 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: I am currently working on a revision of replication agreement status messages. Previously we logged the status like so: Error (%d) - message (sub-message) ... just to get it clear what you suggest, I was a bit confused about first.