[389-devel] Re: PR's might now be an option!

2018-01-04 Thread William Brown
On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 08:31 +0100, Simon Pichugin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 10:33:35AM +1000, William Brown wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We recently have completed two PR based merges, both went > > successfully. > > > > I think it's time we bring up again the option of allowing PR's as > >

[389-devel] Re: PR's might now be an option!

2018-01-03 Thread Simon Pichugin
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 10:33:35AM +1000, William Brown wrote: > Hi all, > > We recently have completed two PR based merges, both went successfully. > > I think it's time we bring up again the option of allowing PR's as a > main workflow for the project. > > I think we can allow both PR + patch

[389-devel] Re: PR's might now be an option!

2018-01-03 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 01/03/2018 07:33 PM, William Brown wrote: > Hi all, > > We recently have completed two PR based merges, both went successfully. > > I think it's time we bring up again the option of allowing PR's as a > main workflow for the project. > > I think we can allow both PR + patch for the time, they