On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 17:15 +1000, William Brown wrote:
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49325
> 
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/8ef878a1004308b10982350df76c0378063147024706bdc774bd8b755e07cd67-0001-Ticket-49325-Proof-of-concept-rust-tqueue-in-sds.patch
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/177ec1c917aa306b5e0006eddad8b805325af5ee3a47afc8b92c53b63dc92f5c-0001-Ticket-49325-Proof-of-concept-rust-tqueue-in-sds.patch

Updated based on comments from jistone.

It's worth noting the Rust queue is now *faster* than the C queue with
work on optimisation. Additionally, thanks to some work with rustc, it's
leak free and proven correct with asan,

-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to