https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516611
There are three separate patches for this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=396463action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=396463action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=396465action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551198
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=397221action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=397221action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From 2ab747aeeb1ea0c049cf6eaf6b15ea38f8088cd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 20:53:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for additional schema/matching rules included with 389
1) The 60qmail.ldif schema we ship used integerMatch and IA5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572677
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=399548action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=399548action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 03/30/2010 03:44 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
Nathan Kinder wrote:
New patch attached.
Nice!
Thanks for the review!
mep.c:491 - value is not freed if it is not a valid filter - also would
be nice to have the error message
From d8234c6633eb1e371fd0590180cd247e87bb0784 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 11:27:51 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Repl Session API needs to check for NULL api before init
The new repl sesssion API will crash when adding a replication
I've tagged 389-ds-base-1.2.6.rc3 - this will hopefully be the actual
1.2.6 release - if not, then I can always create a branch at the
389-ds-base-1.2.6.rc3 tag. The tree is now open
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610177
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=428568action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=428568action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610276
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=428569action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=428569action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617629
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=434078action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=434078action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617862
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=436371action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=436371action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624485
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474704action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474704action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=479564action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=479564action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680284
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480912action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=480912action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676655
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=481466action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=481466action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518890
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=481957action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=481957action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
None of these are serious.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690584
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/Systemd_Revised_Draft
These are the patches for ds-base:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=494777action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=494779action=edit
These are the patches for admin:
a couple more patches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703990
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From 331d60e55e68632a7403adfac1f37bd3202f839d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:24:37 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] skip rebranding current brand
if the current brand is the same as the new brand,
skip rebranding
the branding information is now
From 7950cbb484f6b517cd00fec4cdde93fc305ca01c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:50:00 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] add support for ldif files with changetype: add
IPA config files use changetype: add to add new files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725953
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=515610action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=515610action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723126
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517325action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517325action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723937
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517662action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517662action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729369
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517678action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=517678action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633803
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519337action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519337action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/07/2011 05:06 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Rich Megginson wrote:
The problem comes from the method we use to check if the changelog does
not match the database in replica_check_for_data_reload(). The RUV in
the database contains obsolete elements from replicas that are no longer
in use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590826
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522361action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736712
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522382action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590826
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=522385action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741744
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=525605action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741744
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=525654action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740942
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=525854action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
0cc8c050795e575617fcb1f88ce9890a2358 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 08:12:21 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] set the ENTRY_POST_OP for modrdn betxnpostoperation plugins
The ENTRY_POST_OP needs to be set before calling the betxnpostoperation plugins
for the modrdn operation (e.g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740959
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=530746action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From 17837f58fcf4f09c3df531f274bf8786b65e983a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:50:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] uniqueid formatting - use slapi_u8_to_hex instead of sprintf
Use slapi_u8_to_hex for each part of the uuid to convert to string
From d5312b2bd400695875c1fe68a6a54c612f09eec9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:26:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] reduce calls to csn_as_string and slapi_log_error
csn_as_string is an expensive operation - we should reduce calls to it
many
From ce59c808793ff858bb0771830e000eb54982035c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:34:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] csn_init_as_string should not use sscanf
Added new slapi functions to convert decimal/hex strings to their integral
values. Use
From 1a0660f4fa2da22a6918078442afffba51c8c225 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:41:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] use slapi_hexchar2int and slapi_str_to_u8 everywhere
uniqueid code was using local str2Byte - use slapi_str_to_u8 instead
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/4
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/162
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/256
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/256/0001-Ticket-256-debug-build-assertion-in-ACL_EvalDestroy.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From c17fc9b454c9757ab9f8b0fe3004ec1d1e75c0d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:46:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fix mep sdn compiler warnings
---
ldap/servers/plugins/mep/mep.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/257
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/257/0001-Ticket-257-repl-monitor-doesn-t-work-if-leftmost-hos.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From 8d4fa6d412b0bf911c063b371ad23d9257df312f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:23:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fix recent compiler warnings
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
../ds.git
From 01dd56d3e51180afef8158855ae0e747b43ba89a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:48:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fix compiler warnings
---
ldap/servers/plugins/linkedattrs/linked_attrs.h |1 +
ldap/servers/plugins/memberof/memberof.c
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/262
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/262/0001-Ticket-262-pid-file-not-removed-with-systemd.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From 95cd59308ca30b46ed3eb5cf34f9d1642390f2f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:01:17 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fix mozldap build issues
ldap_start_tls_s needs ldap_ssl.h
mozldap does not define LDAP_MAXINT
---
.../servers/plugins
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/263
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/263/0001-Ticket-263-add-systemd-include-directive.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/272
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/272/0001-Ticket-272-add-tombstonenumsubordinates-to-schema.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/29
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/29/0001-Ticket-29-Samba3-schema-is-missing-sambaTrustedDomai.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/273
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/273/0001-Ticket-273-ruv-tombstone-searches-don-t-work-after-r.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/13
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/13/0001-Ticket-13-slapd-process-exits-when-put-the-database-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 02/01/2012 02:16 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Hi Everyone,
There is an issue with the PAM plugin, that when it performs a
successful bind we actually return error 1 to plugins_call_func(),
which essentially causes the abort of the all plugin processing: the
rest of pre-op, the backend call,
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/277
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/277/0001-Ticket-277-cannot-set-repl-referrals-or-state.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/278
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/278/0001-Ticket-278-Schema-replication-update-failed-Invalid-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
From 9970496be27d5707330e15a4fde0705b88e1e195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:16:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] coverity 12488 Resource leak In attr_index_config(): Leak of memory or pointers to system resources
need to free a in case
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/313
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/289
This is the git format-patch file -
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/289/0001-Ticket-289-allow-betxn-plugin-config-changes.patch
The formatting of the dse code was terrible. So I reformatted it. Here
is the diff with the whitespace-only
On 03/07/2012 07:53 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
An additional fix is needed for this issue. Your patch fixed the
dna_pre_op() function, but the same issue exists in the
dna_be_txn_pre_op() function. The attached patch takes care of this.
ack
On 03/06/2012 09:30 AM, Rich Megginson wrote
On 03/08/2012 02:28 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
While working on ticket 271, I found that the code was almost
unreadable in repl5_inc_run(). The tabs and spacing were all over the
place. So wanted to get this code cleanup checked in before I start
working on a fix, etc.
ack
Thanks,
Mark
--
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/324
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/324/0001-Ticket-324-Sync-with-group-attribute-containing-fail.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 03/23/2012 02:20 PM, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
If htmladmin fails to connect to the server, the cgi could crash.
This patch checks the flag for the server status and avoids the
unnecessary free.
ack
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
389 doesn't seem to handle replica removal very well. The removed
replica remains in the RUV element on all other servers. The
http://port389.org/wiki/Howto:CLEANRUV task exists for this purpose, but
you have to run it on all masters simultaneously, or the removed replica
will show up
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/348
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/348/0001-Ticket-348-crash-in-ldap_initialize-with-multiple-th.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/353
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/353/0001-Ticket-353-coverity-12625-12629-leaks-dead-code-unch.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 04/21/2012 07:18 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
Hi there,
In a scenario where I'm trying to setup a 389 Directory Server automatically,
I ran into an issue with checking ports - no ports nor any networking, are
available when I execute the setup. FWIW, I'm bootstrapping the
I pushed the 389-ds-base-1.2.11 branch and released 389-ds-base-1.2.11.1
Unless you have fixes that are required to get into 1.2.11, just
continue to use master
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
This patch passes entryusn, dna, managedentry, automember,
memofenhancement, and linkedattrs tests. I'm running a full acceptance
test now. Please let me know if you see any problems.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/358
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/382
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/382/0001-Ticket-382-DS-Shuts-down-intermittently.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/383
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/383/0003-Ticket-383-usn-mmr-deletions-are-not-replicated.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 06/13/2012 03:46 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Attached...
ack
Thanks,
Mark
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/360
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/360/0005-Ticket-360-ldapmodify-returns-Operations-error-fix-d.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/387
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/387/0001-Ticket-387-managed-entry-sometimes-doesn-t-delete-th.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/387/0002-Ticket-387-managed-entry-sometimes-doesn-t-delete-th.3.patch
--
389-devel mailing
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/405
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/405/0001-Ticket-405-referint-modrdn-not-working-if-case-is-di.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 07/23/2012 02:46 PM, Chaudhari, Rohit K. wrote:
Hey 389 community,
I had a question. We want to set up 389-ds on a Red Hat VM without
DNS. I read online that disabling SELinux would allow us to
accomplish this. Is this true or false?
False. AFAIK it has nothing to do with SELinux.
. 192.168.122.2 myhost.mydomain.com myhost
If there is anything simpler or something that I missed just let me know.
No, that's it. That's what I use for doing TLS/SSL testing among
virtual machines on the same host system.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg
is not required to get this to work.
Thanks for your time and speedy responses this morning.
-Original Message-
From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 10:55 AM
To: Chaudhari, Rohit K.
Cc: 389 Directory server developer discussion.
Subject: Re: [389-devel
or DNS or
whatever doesn't matter.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:00 AM
To: Chaudhari, Rohit K.
Cc: 389 Directory server developer discussion.
Subject: Re: [389-devel] Setting up 389 DS without DNS
On 07/24/2012 08
.
The default 5 minutes is too long?
Thanks,
Divya.R
*From:*Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
*Sent:* Friday, November 16, 2012 8:11 PM
*To:* 389 Directory server developer discussion.
*Cc:* Divya Ravikumar
*Subject:* Re: [389-devel] Please Review : Decreasing MAX Replication
Retry time
On 11
On 02/04/2013 09:42 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
There has been a request to remove instance specific scripts, and make
them generic and placed in /usr/sbin/
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/528
Should we remove all the scripts from /usr/lib64/dirsrv/slapd-INSTANCE:
bak2db db2index
On 02/04/2013 11:39 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 02/04/2013 12:16 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/04/2013 09:42 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
There has been a request to remove instance specific scripts, and
make them generic and placed in /usr/sbin/
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/528
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47303
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47303/0003-Ticket-47303-start-stop-restart-dirsrv-scripts-shoul.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Please see https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47303#comment:4
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47303
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47303/0003-Ticket-47303-start-stop-restart-dirsrv-scripts-shoul.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
get rid of man pages too
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47302
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47302/0001-Ticket-47302-get-rid-of-sbindir-start-stop-restart-s.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Needed to fix value wrap around in incremental mode
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/613
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/613/0001-Ticket-613-ldclt-add-timestamp-interval-nozeropad-ot.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47320/0004-Ticket-47320-put-conn-on-work_q-not-poll-list-if-con.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 04/19/2013 12:54 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
Hi,
Please review the attached patch that adds the ability for convenient
developer RPM builds. Details are in the patch description.
Note that my patch does not include any changes that will be made by
running autogen.sh. I did this to make
On 04/19/2013 01:21 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 04/19/2013 12:04 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 04/19/2013 12:54 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
Hi,
Please review the attached patch that adds the ability for
convenient developer RPM builds. Details are in the patch description.
Note that my patch
On 04/19/2013 07:24 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
HI,
The previous patch for supporting developer RPM builds was useless for
cases where you want to use mock for building. This new patch makes
things more friendly for mock builds. It also eliminates the need to
run configure before trying to
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47341/0001-Ticket-47341-logconv.pl-m-time-calculation-is-wrong.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47299/0001-Ticket-47299-allow-cmdline-scripts-to-work-with-non-.3.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47299/0001-Ticket-47299-allow-cmdline-scripts-to-work-with-non-.4.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47299/0001-Ticket-47299-allow-cmdline-scripts-to-work-with-non-.5.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47359/0001-Ticket-47359-new-ldap-connections-can-block-ldaps-an.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47377/0001-Ticket-47377-make-listen-backlog-size-configurable.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47378/0001-Ticket-47378-fix-recent-compiler-warnings.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47427/0001-Ticket-47427-Overflow-in-nsslapd-disk-monitoring-thr.4.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47448/0001-Ticket-47448-Segfault-in-389-ds-base-1.3.1.4-1.fc19-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47455/slapd.vg.22729
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47455/0001-Ticket-47455-valgrind-value-mem-leaks-uninit-mem-usa.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
