On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 05:23:24PM -0500, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>Our migration to Pagure is complete. Please use this project for
>filing Directory Server issues (aka Tickets):
>[1]https://pagure.io/389-ds-base
>Trac is now in read-only mode. If you need help with any of this just
Hi team,
please, review the patch with fixes related to older builds.
Also, I think I dont havea permission to set reviewstatus. Please, advise.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49147
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/e4578799a772b2ff2e0a1e02429c849552bb7f2e79f2bdb333db40dcc5e37d6b
Hi team,
please, review my test suites clean up.
Also, Amita, please, review the Polarion test plans part, if the fields fit the
importer.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49156
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/0a0f06b64b6657be75436832cdd41e67dd5b383da2600787a34a7817b2d38602-0001-
Hi team,
please, review my small patch that should fix the points I've missed.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49156
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/f8e868bd9c2af26e54a63e56cefdf7b7d318c0550f1d619cea21af6533ff9254-0001-Issue-49156-Add-more-IDs-and-fix-docstrings.patch
Thanks,
Si
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 04:51:54PM +0100, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi team,
> please, review my small patch that should fix the points I've missed.
>
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49156
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-
Hi team,
for replication test suite I need a tool that can stop the replication
on a big amount of agreements (4 and more, for instance).
Please, review the patch:
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/7
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/b60a5748102ee2a48a8d3b79d6e0b8d5509eca28911edd4c61c4538354e9
Hi team,
please, review my new test cases for replication acceptance test suite
and a small fix for lib389.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/a9826a42730d4ffad4ae826ef9d5e96fa585e06c1dcf67b4e9854a50ca659601-0001-Issue-48085-Expand-the-repl-acce
Hi team,
please, review a small change:
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/22
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/df2047a8be8107ef8a3b31c5a20518a5963e42d98fd07540541164653858318c-0001-Issue-22-Specify-a-basedn-parameter-for-IDM-modules.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
Hello William,
I think my question is for you in the first place.
It regards the default attributes for cn=config feature.
Version tested: 389-ds-base-1.3.6.1-9.el7.x86_64
During TET troubleshooting I've faced two issues:
1. By default, we have:
[root@qeos-126 dirsrv-tet-install]# ldapsearch -h l
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:25:23AM +1000, William Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 22:54 +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> > Hello William,
> > I think my question is for you in the first place.
> > It regards the default attributes for cn=config feature.
> >
>
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 04:02:50PM +1000, William Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 07:55 +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:25:23AM +1000, William Brown wrote:
> > Partly, yes. My question was about possible regression.
> >
> > We have
Hi team,
please review a new patch to lib389.
For some tests we need a way to parse and edit dse.ldif
file. For starters, it will be nice to have next operations support:
- get - Return attribute values under a given entry;
- add - Add an attribute under a given entry;
- delete - Delete singlev
Hi team,
please, review small improvement for DSEldif API module:
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/27
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/bec12d1fa4aa1e66f2915c62c6a7bc61c7ffa53c06c225ca8f0d663b1f664131-0001-Add-new-DSEldif-object.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi team,
please, review the test plan and the code.
There is a few failures that probably reviel new bugs.
Or the test cases are wrong (I expect wrong behaviour for example).
Anyway, please, share you thoughts.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49021
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/file
Hi team,
please review my revised patch:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49021
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/2d03c0b6d91bf17bbf60021262c03401fd0af2d3f00466654b3aa24f7683b74f-0001-Issue-49028-Add-autotuning-test-suite.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Hi team,
please, review a small fix:
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/27
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/f27d207209b87666524e606364971bcb44f302c20df107d4901fc9e18f6bd5fe-0001-Issue-27-Fix-get-function-in-tests.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Hi team,
please, review a patch:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/623
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/59ae3de25d0f7dccc880c062c640bf7ef2b3fd1c8b737f51e97bfc75bbcaa9a7-0001-Issue-623-Add-test-case-and-refactor-the-cleanallruv.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatur
Hi team,
please, review the new patch for suites/ds-tools:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49301
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/704b8814bfbd0b13c6e04f3c696a633d3fb236bc927e41827f32e4a58768ce7e-0001-Issue-49301-Add-one-logpipe-test-case.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description:
Hi team,
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/77#comment-449299
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/2aef109dbf0f23a359c15f209c6c523cebda4faf583125ff62e0a228f8c3b321-Guidelines-for-using-pytest-and-lib389_47541162.html
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
Hi team,
please review a patch that fixes Replicas DSLdapObject.
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/79
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/febe12b17a148405c527ed4938a9ef06c1d5046c9c3070ad32a0770526f33ee0-0001-Issue-79-Fix-replica.py-and-add-tests.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description:
/80825f0aee3bcb098b89d442af4526df8b13e2082496de83669dc4220199002e-0001-Issue-79-Fix-replica.py-and-add-tests.patch
Thanks,
Simon
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:14:59PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi team,
> please review a patch that fixes Replicas DSLdapObject.
>
> https://pagure.io/lib
ps://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/80825f0aee3bcb098b89d442af4526df8b13e2082496de83669dc4220199002e-0001-Issue-79-Fix-replica.py-and-add-tests.patch
>
> Thanks,
> Simon
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:14:59PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> > Hi team,
> > please
Hi team,
a new version:
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/77#comment-451622
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/6047ac156e06192837271afc2770a83f7f3206400669537bb1d8f43ab7b9a434-Guidelines-for-using-pytest-and-lib389_47541162.html
Thanks,
Simon
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:31:50PM +0200, Simon
Hi team,
please, review a new patch for big topology refactoring.
I'll add a patch for 389-ds-base tests before the pushing it.
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/83
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/57003067766f1a08da96060e1d51e95583cc5a43ef98d73991fb2576a50501ce-0001-Issue-83-Add-an-util-for-
Hi team,
please, check out the issues. They were updated recently (or just
waiting for the review):
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/77
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/6047ac156e06192837271afc2770a83f7f3206400669537bb1d8f43ab7b9a434-Guidelines-for-using-pytest-and-lib389_47541162.html
http
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:00:23PM +1000, William Brown wrote:
> My vote is to merge them. I came to this decision because I believe that
> this will make development against multiple branches easier with regard
> to testing and backport of patches. For example, we'll know that lib389
> that's insi
, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Add enum34 to requirements.txt for py2 compatibility
>
> https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/79
> https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/7be353523a4a7ad8382a9a98ad778819f5e7557ab1812b9d1e595499ef821244-0001-Issue-79-Fix-replica.py-and-add-tests.patch
>
> On
Hi team,
please review a patch for 389-ds-base tests:
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/83
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/9d807e6ff14eb4df440feea988db6f94794eba9d40b3204b8ed8286d9fce3dff-0001-Issue-83-lib389-Replace-topology-agmt-objects.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Hi team,
some of the tests in 389-ds-base are broken.
The following patches should fix them:
For 389-ds-base:
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/83
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/7ce24a6d79ce0242a200354133f65d910af46f1f73da7497d45312cd19280f44-0001-Issue-83-lib389-Fix-tests-and-create_test.p
Hi team,
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/91
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/f9874b05dcab8b6e01517163218c9572b14373b8809cf93a1a38827c3db1873f-0001-Issue-91-Fix-replication-m1h1c1-topology.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi team,
please, review the patch for lib389.
I've checked, it fixes tickets/ticket48325_test.py.
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/85
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/d5d0b94c97f8d341f4785e76c94c719d3902b80c3f339f047a9e95316ff28dcd-0001-Issue-85-Remove-legacy-replication-attribute.patch
Tha
Hi team,
Most of the comments were applied. Thanks!
Now the layout is:
- index.rst - welcoming word, Table of Contents and Contact Us.
- guidelines.rst - is included into index.rst and contains basic test
development workflow, pytest features overview, and basic lib389 and
python-ldap features
Hi team,
please, check out the new docs.
https://fedorapeople.org/~spichugi/html/index.html
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/77
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/2e181d5321f194587899b1cbb37455d86d2754daeacb2d02c6de60aa9830b079-0001-Issue-77-Refactor-docstrings-in-rST-format-part-1.patch
T
Hi team,
please, review:
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/77
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/486d6f41143e829fde00c722747e95d4ad03efafd0680b1e78f1c95ec693c3c0-0001-Issue-77-Fix-changelogdb-param-issue.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Hi team,
please, review the patch for suite docs.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49381
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/5e909fe03f497ebad570a73364de1c2145f5c9b99d88c0543628ff5c0f0b038a-0001-Issue-49381-Refactor-numerous-suite-docstrings.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Descr
New version:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49381
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/afa9b1a73b02e21633279b939d02deff33328cdc100b4c7c80645dd6b532f7ac-0001-Issue-49381-Refactor-numerous-suite-docstrings.patch
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 05:42:20PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi t
New version:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49381
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/525619ec2b6d51ca4a78998e6b40c43d344e19d180e97ee67f1e09c82721f86f-0001-Issue-49381-Refactor-numerous-suite-docstrings.patch
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 05:42:20PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi t
Hi team,
please review two line patch.
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/99
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/f3e504a5779b08eedf743645be3ab3af601213a5f35e9e44dd7f02254a43f72c-0001-Issue-99-Fix-typo-in-create_topology.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
Hi team,
please, review my second patch for suite docstrings:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49381
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/350ce1073ac05a722674475b679a346142e0b000b244df5c242b877ddd316a86-0001-Issue-49381-Refactor-numerous-suite-docstrings-Part-.patch
Thanks,
Simon
si
Fixed the issues:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49381
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/b050293a47890b3527564aa336937830b0fc298a90037f972e46d49477134a24-0001-Issue-49381-Refactor-numerous-suite-docstrings-Part-.patch
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 03:27:36PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote
Hi team,
please, review the Python 3 support patch for ACL.
Also, please, check it if you are a developer. Because it contains
the indended way to use lib389 feature for Python 3 support.
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/3
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/f5707f366a5769c0232aaa0a0270db72372
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:14:12PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi team,
> please, review the Python 3 support patch for ACL.
>
> Also, please, check it if you are a developer. Because it contains
> the indended way to use lib389 feature for Python 3 support.
>
> https://p
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48393
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/a900cbac9d8d6ed0bd14a424dd966cca4233a1376fb392c2129d5987d3073f90-0001-Issue-48393-Add-a-test-case-for-nsds5ReplicaId-check.patch
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
A second part:
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/77
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/b050293a47890b3527564aa336937830b0fc298a90037f972e46d49477134a24-0001-Issue-49381-Refactor-numerous-suite-docstrings-Part-.patch
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:33:24PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi t
https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/a7f959f31cfd6f5b4f837dd715bf1d0beb96a182e30a0c1b13bfc4d3cdfbc905-0001-Issue-lib389-77-Refactor-docstrings-in-rST-format-pa.patch
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 04:44:07PM +0100, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> A second part:
>
> https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/7
Hi team,
please, review a small test case I need to verify BZ:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49408
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/f5457f377c15dd5d35d153baa775a8be15f883c419d929fb41a4203be145a200-0001-Issue-49408-Add-a-test-case-for-nsds5ReplicaId-check.patch
Thanks,
Simon
s
Hi team,
please, review the Python 3 support patch.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/47536
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/1cdbed5b2520a0f85c950305ee3f40e605f8d263129ff70996952ba8ac94d895-0001-Issue-47536-Add-Python-3-support-and-move-test-case-.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.as
I've fixed the issues:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/e023d32821b13103e662b94b1348a0a3016b3ea15fd24b4e2bebfefbdae9e8e6-0001-Issue-47536-Add-Python-3-support-and-move-test-case-.patch
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:53:17PM +0100, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi team,
> please,
Hi team,
please review a small test case:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49374
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/f23c2afa41b204756126c621b8a0c12678179048a725e587f775b0a4cfc19200-0001-Issue-49374-Add-CI-test-case.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 10:33:35AM +1000, William Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We recently have completed two PR based merges, both went successfully.
>
> I think it's time we bring up again the option of allowing PR's as a
> main workflow for the project.
>
> I think we can allow both PR + patch
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49523
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/da1e9819a28050aed3d00828a1b8212f19420411d6fd8e11aabe7a6776f851c3-0001-Ticket-49523-Refactor-CI-test.patch
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
389-devel mai
Hi team,
I'll be on PTO 02.02, I'll check the comments on Monday
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49558
Practicing pull-requests. Also, the test will fail at the tearDown.
It will be fixed in https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49551
Thanks!
Hi team, please, review my rework of Sankar's patch.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/f78334baf6bc2eab6b9566f79aa2321b262ac604ff6b1a32dba7bf806376-0001-Issue-48085-Add-encryption-cl5-test-suite.patch
Thanks!
__
Hi team,
please, review my updated patch:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/8c490b029e355f97c0a5c992fc856ddaca3b14a93c7f8c9428b87891a7a02bc9-0001-Issue-48085-Add-encryption-cl5-test-suite.patch
Thanks!
_
Final version. All tests from other tickets were added.
Please, review.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49558
- Original Message -
> From: "Simon Pichugin"
> To: "389 Directory server developer discussion."
> <389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
Hi team,
please, review a draft of RFE tests
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49567
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please, review the full version of the RFE test suite.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49567
- Original Message -
> From: "Simon Pichugin"
> To: "389 Directory server developer discussion."
> <389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: W
Hi team,
please, review a new pull request:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49578
And a gentle reminder...
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49567
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
Hi team,
please, review a small fix:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49584
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49590
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le..
Hi team,
please, review a small fix for nunc-stance tests:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49572
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49592
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
Hi team,
please, review:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49595
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49593
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedor
Fixed compile warnings.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 06:53:53PM +0100, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi team,
> please, review:
>
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49595
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49593
>
> Thanks,
> Simon
>
Hi William!
Thank you for the email. It has clarified the things for me. :)
I still have one question though.
Do I understand right that I need also to cast types with these types from
inttypes.h?
So use it not only in the defenitions.
- sprintf(buf, "%lu", (long unsigned int)maxsize);
+ sprintf(
Fixed issues with inttypes.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 08:01:33PM +0100, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Fixed compile warnings.
>
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 06:53:53PM +0100, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> > Hi team,
> > please, review:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/389-ds-
- Original Message -
> From: "William Brown"
> To: "Simon Pichugin"
> Cc: "389-devel" <389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 12:30:40 AM
> Subject: Re: Use of int types in the code base,
>
> On Thu
> On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 02:35 -0500, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "William Brown"
> > > To: "Simon Pichugin"
> > > Cc: "389-devel" <389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> >
Hi team,
please, review:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49109
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49613
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedor
Hi team,
as William and Matus proposed, I've changed nsDS5ReplicaTransportInfo: TLS to
LDAP+StartTLS.
Also, I've changed existed TLS test suite so it covers the change.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:45:52AM +0100, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi team,
> please, review:
>
> https:/
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:05:06PM +0100, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi team,
> as William and Matus proposed, I've changed nsDS5ReplicaTransportInfo: TLS to
> LDAP+StartTLS.
> Also, I've changed existed TLS test suite so it covers the change.
I changed the name for DNA_PRO
Hi team,
please review a PR for dynamic plugins test suite fix.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49581
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49626
I devided it in two parts for easy review.
https://pagure.io/fork/spichugi/389-ds-base/c/9c7a76e27adfff02c40abdd4d49acfa187b97a14
First part a
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:17:06PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi team,
> please review a PR for dynamic plugins test suite fix.
>
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49581
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49626
> I devided it in two parts for easy review.
>
Hi team,
please review a small fix for memory leak issue:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49511
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49638
Thanks!
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an ema
The LDAP+StartTLS was changed back to StartTLS by Mark suggestions and
I support his commentary.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49613#comment-50699
Please, check once again if everything is okay.
Thanks!
Simon
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:38:51AM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> On
Hi team, please, review a lib389 Python installer (remove function) patch.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49641
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49612
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
Hi team,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49643
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49642
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi team,
please review a test suite with simple tests for Backends(DSLdapObject)
implementation.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49406
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49647
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedor
Hi team,
please, review:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49538
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49651
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedor
I've changed it to c_rehash tool and added a small fix
related t remove_ds_instance.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 04:06:35PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi team,
> please, review:
>
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49538
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49651
Hi team,
please review:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49650
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49653
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedora
Hi team,
please, review:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49659
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49657
Thanks!
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedor
Hi team,
recently, we had a discussion on a scrum meeting about lib389 and its new API.
If I understood right there was an opinion that lib389 DSLdapObjects API
is not very intuitive and it is much easier stick to python-ldap style
because it uses ldapmodify/ldapadd wording (or close enough to it
Hi Thierry,
I agree with you, it was exactly my proposition :)
Keeping main python-ldap elements is important because we don't want
to implement or mask/wrap this basic functionality (like working with controls,
etc)
we just want to redirect them.
Ideally, we should make our admin library very i
The issues mentioned by Mark were fixed.
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 02:32:22PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi team,
> please, review:
>
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49659
> https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49657
>
Fixed the issues Viktor has reported. Please, review.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:25:35PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:17:06PM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> > Hi team,
> > please review a PR for dynamic plugins test suite fix.
> >
> > ht
Hi team,
please, review a docstrings commit.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49381
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49708
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-de
Hi team,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49646
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49709
And the issues were fixed:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49381
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49708
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
Hi team,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49761
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49762
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi team,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49640
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49771
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi team,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49761
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49787
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi team,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49640
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49822
Thanks!
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi team,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49846
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49761
Thanks!
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi team,
And especially Mark, please, take a look if it is okay for WebUI/CLI:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49844
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49853
And a gentle reminder:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:21:58AM +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> https://pagu
Hi team,
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49381
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49861
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi team,
please, review WebUI schema PR:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49928
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49957
Thanks!
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi team,
please, review the WebUI schema change.
Also, I wait for this to be merged
https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap/pull/247
but my PR will work as intended without it, I put a small workaround
which we will remove later.
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49966
https://pagure.i
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 02:15:55PM +0530, Anuj Borah wrote:
>Hi all,
Hi Anuj,
>Please review these PRs.
>Pending from Long Time.
>[1]https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50180
>[2]https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50192
Could you please rebase them onto master?
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 01:21:28PM +1000, William Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So it's been a while since I pushed this, but again, I think I want to bring
> this up. I'd like to write the new logging backend in Rust.
>
> I'll start with a summary:
>
> Pros:
> * Faster development time due to str
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:50:48AM -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
> On 5/22/19 9:02 PM, William Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
Hi William,
> > I would propose to change this - but I feel we are now wedged on change by
> > two things:
> >
> > * Red Hat have documented these tools, and it's a big ask to ge
Hi team,
please, review my recent PR:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50440
I've added CI test and I've done stress testing to see if performans is
affected (the details are inside)
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
Hi team,
I'm in the process of creating a Vagrant file which is close to the customer's
ENV.
It is heavilly based on Viktor's beaker task.
I use it for building and testing my code. And it is pretty important to build
with ASAN.
Currently, what I do is:
1. Set 'ASAN_ON = 1' in rpm.mk
2. Run `mak
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
