On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 20:26 -0600, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> Yep, that’s a very good tutorial indeed! To answer my own question
> then, since the default scope is sub and the filter is cn=replica,
> the replica entry is found?
Exactly! :)
>
>
> > On Nov 9, 2017, at 5:03 PM, William Brown
> >
Yep, that’s a very good tutorial indeed! To answer my own question then, since
the default scope is sub and the filter is cn=replica, the replica entry is
found?
> On Nov 9, 2017, at 5:03 PM, William Brown wrote:
>
> Hey mate,
>
> I think this could really help you. I wrote a series of blog
On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 13:10 -0600, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> > Not quite. When we have this scenario:
> >
> > M1M2
> >
> > T0 Add E1
> >
> > T1Add E2
>
> ...
>
> Thank you, William.
>
>
> > > Also, and this is more of a general LDAP question, in the same
> > > article they
> Not quite. When we have this scenario:
>
> M1M2
>
> T0 Add E1
>
> T1Add E2
...
Thank you, William.
>> Also, and this is more of a general LDAP question, in the same
>> article they talk about removing dangling RUVs. They do a search
>> for:
>>
>> dn:cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dex
