[389-users] Re: autosizing the cache

Hi William, > On Mar 19, 2018, at 9:18 PM, William Brown wrote: > > yeah, dncachesize is manual. But I think dncachesize is per backend, > not part of cn=config,cn=ldbm plugin. Yes, I see one for changelog and one for userRoot. Here’s the data: > dbscan -f

[389-users] Re: autosizing the cache

On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 20:58 -0500, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > > Dogtag is Java/Tomcat. It's well known for consuming large volumes > > of > > ram! > > Ah, I thought it was something besides that :) Nope, just that :) > > > Sure, sounds reasonable to me - I'd want to see your database sizes > >

[389-users] Re: autosizing the cache

> Dogtag is Java/Tomcat. It's well known for consuming large volumes of > ram! Ah, I thought it was something besides that :) > Sure, sounds reasonable to me - I'd want to see your database sizes to > make a complete assesment, but it seems pretty reasonable to me. I will get that for you.

[389-users] Re: autosizing the cache

On Sun, 2018-03-18 at 21:57 -0500, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > Thank you for the detailed response, William. That’s great info. You > mentioned FreeIPA in passing and that’s actually what I use 389-ds > for. You mentioned dogtag eating memory. You mean it has a memory > leak or some other memory