Sorry, this formatted, poorly. Find attached,
# --- BEGIN COPYRIGHT BLOCK ---
# Copyright (C) 2019 William Brown
# All rights reserved.
#
# License: GPL (version 3 or any later version).
# See LICENSE for details.
# --- END COPYRIGHT BLOCK ---
#
from lib389._constants import DEFAULT_SUFFIX
from
> On 21 Feb 2019, at 13:12, William Brown wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 21 Feb 2019, at 08:57, Olivier JUDITH wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm moving many ou to one level up
>> ou=SITE1,ou=BU,ou=Account,dc=...
>> ou=SITE2,ou=BU,ou=Account,dc=...
>> to
>> ou=SITE1,ou=Account,dc=..
>> ou=SITE2,ou=Acco
> On 21 Feb 2019, at 08:57, Olivier JUDITH wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm moving many ou to one level up
> ou=SITE1,ou=BU,ou=Account,dc=...
> ou=SITE2,ou=BU,ou=Account,dc=...
> to
> ou=SITE1,ou=Account,dc=..
> ou=SITE2,ou=Account,dc=...
>
> Don't want OU=BU anymore.
>
> ou=SITE1,ou=Account,dc
Hi,
I'm moving many ou to one level up
ou=SITE1,ou=BU,ou=Account,dc=...
ou=SITE2,ou=BU,ou=Account,dc=...
to
ou=SITE1,ou=Account,dc=..
ou=SITE2,ou=Account,dc=...
Don't want OU=BU anymore.
ou=SITE1,ou=Account,dc=... has less than 100 entries it works fine
ou=SITE2,ou=Account,dc=... has more th
We would need to test this scenario, but it could very likely be a bug in the
server.
To be sure the conditions you have here are:
ou=start,dc=…
ou=destination,dc=…
In ou=start you have 800+ entries.
Then you are doing a modrdn of ou=start to ou=start,ou=destination,dc=…, and
the error condi
Hi,
I have activated Referential Integrity plugin on my instance in order to move
several OU to a new parent subtree. Also to update automatically uniqueMember
attribute defined in group member .
It works fine with few user entries under some OU but fails when the OU
contains more than 400 en
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:35:46 +0100
> From: Ludwig Krispenz
> On 02/20/2019 03:24 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
>> > Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>> >> On 2/20/19 5:59 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:50:11 +0100
> From: wodel youchi
>
> Hi,
>
>
You are correct that a CA is included in IdM. But many organizations
design their root CA as an independent device, often kept offline for
security. The IdM CA is then configured as a Sub-CA, responsible for its
own security domain. The benefit here is that the root CA can also provide
certifica
On 02/20/2019 03:24 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 2/20/19 5:59 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:50:11 +0100
From: wodel youchi
Hi,
is it possible to create a replication matser/master or master/slave
between 389DS and another LDAP server openldap for example?
Mark Reynolds wrote:
>
> On 2/20/19 5:59 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
>>> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:50:11 +0100
>>> From: wodel youchi
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is it possible to create a replication matser/master or master/slave
>>> between 389DS and another LDAP server openldap for example?
>>>
>>> Regards.
On 2/20/19 5:59 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:50:11 +0100
From: wodel youchi
Hi,
is it possible to create a replication matser/master or master/slave
between 389DS and another LDAP server openldap for example?
Regards.
Maybe. OpenLDAP has recently added support for replica
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:50:11 +0100
> From: wodel youchi
>
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to create a replication matser/master or master/slave
> between 389DS and another LDAP server openldap for example?
>
> Regards.
Maybe. OpenLDAP has recently added support for replication using a retro
ch
12 matches
Mail list logo