On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:34 PM Gary Waters <gwaters-...@caltech.edu> wrote:
> I was pointed at EPEL8. It appears that the packages are being uploaded > to all the mirrors as el8. > > https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/8/Modular/x86_64/ > > Can the RHEL9 versions be built into epel/9 instead ? > There is no EPEL9 yet. So to test the next versions of 389ds on EL there are 'next' and 'testing' streams [1].] Looks like you're using 389-directory-server module from EPEL8 with 'testing' stream, and you have a mix of different module versions (12009 and 10764). As Mark said, you can't run different versions of 389-ds-base, lib389 and cockpit-389ds, they should all come from the same module. [1] https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/download.html#centos-81-ds-14x > > Thanks so much for your help, downgrading helped. > > -Gary > > > On 7/7/21 2:57 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > > > On 7/7/21 5:18 PM, Gary Waters wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, > >> > >> I have been having trouble with Cockpit and 389 since I upgraded to > >> 389-ds-base to 1.4.X from 1.3.X. > >> > >> I was initially having trouble with rendering the replication page > >> but I have determined that the monitoring page is not rendering as > >> well. (or maybe I am not waiting log enough, I waited 15 minutes). > >> > >> Has anyone had any luck on making this work again ? > >> > >> Ctrl-Shift-J had errors about some CSP stuff, but I allowed > >> everything from the url via Chrome and Brave Browser settings, so now > >> the only error (apparently a big one for both pages) is > >> > >> index.js:117 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'length' of > >> undefined > >> at Function.<anonymous> (index.js:117) > >> at cockpit.js:1 > >> at cockpit.js:1 > >> at A (cockpit.js:1) > >> > >> I tried upgrading to the latest cockpit 389 plugin but it still > >> doesnt work. > >> > >> Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.4 (Ootpa) > >> > >> 4.18.0-305.7.1.el8_4.x86_64 > >> > >> 389-ds-base-libs-1.4.3.17-1.module_el8+10764+2b5f8656.x86_64 > >> 389-ds-base-1.4.3.17-1.module_el8+10764+2b5f8656.x86_64 > >> cockpit-389-ds-2.0.4-2.module_el8+12009+23f3e50a.noarch > >> python3-lib389-1.4.3.17-1.module_el8+10764+2b5f8656.noarch > > > > This is definitely not supported. Not even sure how you even got > > 2.0.4 for RHEL 8 (since that is the RHEL 9 version). Anyway you can > > NOT run different versions of 389-ds-base, python-lib389 and > > cockpit-389-ds. They are very tightly interconnected. The UI uses > > lib389 to perform all its operations, and lib389 is vastly different > > in 2.0.4 verses 1.4.3. Yes some of it might work, but most of it > > probably won't. > > > > If these were the same version, then I can still not explain this > > behavior, and it is not a known issue. Is your browser/client far > > away from the server hosting the server/cockpit? Over a WAN? For me > > the entire UI loads in 10-15 seconds (and each tab only takes a few > > seconds to load), but I am not going over a WAN to connect to it. > > > > If you get all the components to the same version then I'd be > > interested in seeing the console log from the chrome browser (we do > > not test Brave), just Firefox and Chrome. Make sure the console > > logging (F12) is including the timestamp, then try and capture these > > "rendering issues" and send us the logging please. The UI logs all > > lib389/CLI commands it uses to gather the UI data, so we should see > > what commands are run when things are not working. You can even copy > > and paste those exact commands (dsconf ...) from the console logging > > on the server machine and you can test if they respond quickly when > > run locally. > > > > But... The UI is a single page web page app that is a Cockpit > > plugin. There is much performance improvements we can make to it on > > the DS side of things. Now the UI that ships with 1.4.3 "should" be > > minimized (aka production ready). Can you send the "ls" output of: > > /usr/share/cockpit/389-console/ There is a slim chance you have a > > non-production version of the UI since you are on a older version of > > 1.4.3 (the latest for RHEL 8 is 1.4.3.22 or higher). So upgrading to > > the latest 1.4.3 version is another option you should look into. > > > > Otherwise I suspect there is a network issue at play, and the console > > logging (F12) might help figure out what the UI is doing while there > > are these rendering issues. > > > > Again don't gather any on this information until all the 389 > > components are at the same version. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mark > > > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: > >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > >> List Archives: > >> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > > _______________________________________________ > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- Viktor
_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
