Re: [389-users] db2ldif vs ldapmodify: turn up debugging of db2ldif?

2014-05-20 Thread Morgan Jones
On May 19, 2014, at 4:48 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com wrote: Could you send out an entry placed at ending line 5457262 of file /var/tmp/students_fixed.ldif to the list? Probably. It’s k-1student data so always a sensitive topic. I’ll work on getting approval. Our student records

Re: [389-users] db2ldif vs ldapmodify: turn up debugging of db2ldif?

2014-05-20 Thread Morgan Jones
On May 19, 2014, at 5:57 PM, Lulzim KELMENI lkelm...@mairie-saint-ouen.fr wrote: Hello, I may be wrong but i think there is a syntax problem in your ldif at line 5457262. Yes, and 2000+ other lines. Our entries are ~70 attributes a piece so I’ll need to work through each line one by

Re: [389-users] db2ldif vs ldapmodify: turn up debugging of db2ldif?

2014-05-20 Thread Noriko Hosoi
On May 19, 2014, at 4:48 PM, Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com wrote: Could you send out an entry placed at ending line 5457262 of file /var/tmp/students_fixed.ldif to the list? Probably. It’s k-1student data so always a sensitive topic. I’ll work on getting approval. Our student records

[389-users] db2ldif vs ldapmodify: turn up debugging of db2ldif?

2014-05-19 Thread Morgan Jones
I am working on a move from CentOS Directory (8.2.8) on CentOS 5 to 389-ds 1.2.11 on CentOS 6. I’m using a combination of the CentOS repositories and epel as suggested here. I'm finding ldif2db rejects entries while if I add them via ldapmodify they go in with no errors. This is a problem

Re: [389-users] db2ldif vs ldapmodify: turn up debugging of db2ldif?

2014-05-19 Thread Noriko Hosoi
Could you send out an entry placed at ending line 5457262 of file /var/tmp/students_fixed.ldif to the list? Morgan Jones wrote: I am working on a move from CentOS Directory (8.2.8) on CentOS 5 to 389-ds 1.2.11 on CentOS 6. I’m using a combination of the CentOS repositories and epel as