Re: [389-users] changelog deadlock replication failures with DNA

2013-06-18 Thread thierry bordaz
On 06/18/2013 12:35 AM, Mahadevan, Venkat wrote: I do not know why your environment is prone to trigger db_deadlock (lot of replica agreements, VM, slow disks...). I think the best way to progress is that you fill a ticket/bug so that we may track the issue. Note this bug is possibly

Re: [389-users] changelog deadlock replication failures with DNA

2013-06-18 Thread Rich Megginson
On 06/18/2013 01:51 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: On 06/18/2013 12:35 AM, Mahadevan, Venkat wrote: I do not know why your environment is prone to trigger db_deadlock (lot of replica agreements, VM, slow disks...). I think the best way to progress is that you fill a ticket/bug so that we may

Re: [389-users] changelog deadlock replication failures with DNA

2013-06-18 Thread Mahadevan, Venkat
Running in a VM should not be an issue if it follows the usual tuning recommendation. But of course it adds a layer when investigating a RC. What is weird is to hit so frequent (50) deadlock in a single DB call. In addition it looks like it always happen when updating the CL so I can think to