[389-users] Re: anonymous binds

2021-10-19 Thread Marc Sauton
depending on the filters used, an error 11 / err=11 / ADMIN_LIMIT_EXCEEDED / "Administrative limit exceeded" could be returned, and depending on the LDAP client, it could be an important error. it may be a good idea to set a DN for nsslapd-anonlimitsdn , see

[389-users] Re: anonymous binds

2021-10-19 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 10/19/21 1:43 PM, Michael Starling wrote: Good afternoon. I have a few questions about anon binds. In theory if you have 3000 user objects in the directory and anonymous binds have a limit returning 2000 entries can you still use anonymous binds in LDAP client configurations without

[389-users] Re: changelog program - _cl5AddThread - Invalid changelog state - 2

2021-10-19 Thread Kees Bakker
On 19-10-2021 14:13, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/19/21 5:35 AM, Kees Bakker wrote: On 18-10-2021 20:18, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/18/21 1:52 PM, Kees Bakker wrote: On 18-10-2021 16:30, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/18/21 8:17 AM, Kees Bakker wrote: Hi, Today I tried 389-base 1.4.4.17 for a

[389-users] anonymous binds

2021-10-19 Thread Michael Starling
Good afternoon. I have a few questions about anon binds. In theory if you have 3000 user objects in the directory and anonymous binds have a limit returning 2000 entries can you still use anonymous binds in LDAP client configurations without issues? Or does something else take place when a

[389-users] Re: changelog program - _cl5AddThread - Invalid changelog state - 2

2021-10-19 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 10/19/21 11:07 AM, Kees Bakker wrote: On 19-10-2021 15:58, Kees Bakker wrote: On 19-10-2021 14:13, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/19/21 5:35 AM, Kees Bakker wrote: On 18-10-2021 20:18, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/18/21 1:52 PM, Kees Bakker wrote: On 18-10-2021 16:30, Mark Reynolds wrote: On

[389-users] Re: changelog program - _cl5AddThread - Invalid changelog state - 2

2021-10-19 Thread Kees Bakker
On 19-10-2021 15:58, Kees Bakker wrote: On 19-10-2021 14:13, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/19/21 5:35 AM, Kees Bakker wrote: On 18-10-2021 20:18, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/18/21 1:52 PM, Kees Bakker wrote: On 18-10-2021 16:30, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/18/21 8:17 AM, Kees Bakker wrote: Hi,

[389-users] Re: changelog program - _cl5AddThread - Invalid changelog state - 2

2021-10-19 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 10/19/21 5:35 AM, Kees Bakker wrote: On 18-10-2021 20:18, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/18/21 1:52 PM, Kees Bakker wrote: On 18-10-2021 16:30, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/18/21 8:17 AM, Kees Bakker wrote: Hi, Today I tried 389-base 1.4.4.17 for a fix of retro cl trimming [1] Unfortunately

[389-users] Re: changelog program - _cl5AddThread - Invalid changelog state - 2

2021-10-19 Thread Kees Bakker
On 18-10-2021 20:18, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/18/21 1:52 PM, Kees Bakker wrote: On 18-10-2021 16:30, Mark Reynolds wrote: On 10/18/21 8:17 AM, Kees Bakker wrote: Hi, Today I tried 389-base 1.4.4.17 for a fix of retro cl trimming [1] Unfortunately the ns-slapd got into some sort of