> On 19 Apr 2023, at 15:44, Johannes Kastl wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
> On 19.04.23 at 01:19 William Brown wrote:
>
>> The docker.com images are maintained by myself at SUSE. Because of how we
>> build them from https://build.opensuse.org/ and via
>> https://registry.opensuse.org/ we can't
Hi William,
On 19.04.23 at 01:19 William Brown wrote:
The docker.com images are maintained by myself at SUSE. Because of how we
build them from https://build.opensuse.org/ and via
https://registry.opensuse.org/ we can't actually "patch" 2.2 and 2.1, so we
really only have latest. Hindsight is
> On 18 Apr 2023, at 16:15, Johannes Kastl wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am in the process of rewriting my helm chart for 389ds (stay tuned, I'll
> send another mail once it is ready), and noticed the lack of recent tags for
> the container images:
>
> https://hub.docker.com/r/389ds/dirsrv only
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 9:13 AM Johannes Kastl wrote:
> Hi Viktor,
>
> On 18.04.23 at 09:02 Viktor Ashirov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 8:15 AM Johannes Kastl
> wrote:
>
> >> https://hub.docker.com/r/389ds/dirsrv only has 2.1, 2.2 and latest. 2.2
> >> and
> >> latest are 8 months old.
>
Hi Viktor,
On 18.04.23 at 09:02 Viktor Ashirov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 8:15 AM Johannes Kastl wrote:
https://hub.docker.com/r/389ds/dirsrv only has 2.1, 2.2 and latest. 2.2
and
latest are 8 months old.
https://quay.io/repository/389ds/dirsrv?tab=tags only has latest and c9s
without
Hi Johannes,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 8:15 AM Johannes Kastl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am in the process of rewriting my helm chart for 389ds (stay tuned, I'll
> send
> another mail once it is ready), and noticed the lack of recent tags for
> the
> container images:
>
Oh, nice! Looking forward to
