From: Mark Reynolds
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 9:36 AM
To: Michael Starling ; General discussion list for
the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [389-users] anonymous binds
On 10/21/21 9:26 AM, Michael
On 10/21/21 9:26 AM, Michael Starling wrote:
*From:* Mark Reynolds
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 19, 2021 3:47 PM
*To:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
<389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>;
From: Mark Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 3:47 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
<389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>; Michael Starling
Subject: Re: [389-users] anonymous binds
On 10/19/21 1:43 PM, Michael
depending on the filters used, an error 11 / err=11 / ADMIN_LIMIT_EXCEEDED
/ "Administrative limit exceeded" could be returned, and depending on the
LDAP client, it could be an important error.
it may be a good idea to set a DN for nsslapd-anonlimitsdn , see
On 10/19/21 1:43 PM, Michael Starling wrote:
Good afternoon.
I have a few questions about anon binds.
In theory if you have 3000 user objects in the directory and anonymous
binds have a limit returning 2000 entries can you still use anonymous
binds in LDAP client configurations without
