Re: Problems installing built application

2018-01-30 Thread Keisuke Miyako via 4D_Tech
extended finder attributes cause code sign to fail, but of course, clearing them with xattr mean little if the app is not signed in the first place. basically, if you don’t sign a built application, you have no choice but to ask the end user to disable gate keeper for the app, and install it

RE: Problems installing built application

2018-01-30 Thread Timothy Penner via 4D_Tech
Hi James, I agree with what Chuck Miller posted (I think he was quoting my reply to your previous thread: http://kb.4d.com/resources/inug?msgid=GmailId1607a1da70d0a99b). Definitely start signing your application if you are not already doing so - and then make sure to distribute your signed

Re: Win32API 8.1.2 gui_GetWindowEx("") in v16r5 (Seth Leeper)

2018-01-30 Thread Keisuke Miyako via 4D_Tech
to be clear, you don't need a "v16" SDK to support v16 or v16 R releases. the SDK version is only bumped when there is a major change to the architecture, in my 10+ years of using it, that has only happened 4 times: v2004 (mach-o bundle) v11 (unicode mode) v12 (64-bit for windows) v14 (64-bit

Re: Problems installing built application

2018-01-30 Thread Charles Miller via 4D_Tech
One thing I would for sure do is get your application signed so you do not get into instance where OS won’t lety it run. Here are notes from My assumption is that the application is falling victim to Gatekeeper and being translocated to a read-only location. Apple documents how to get around

Re: Win32API 8.1.2 gui_GetWindowEx("") in v16r5 (Seth Leeper)

2018-01-30 Thread Jeffrey Kain via 4D_Tech
They just announced (on the forums) that it will be available on github. -- Jeffrey Kain jeffrey.k...@gmail.com > On Jan 30, 2018, at 3:32 PM, Seth Leeper via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> > wrote: > > To the best of my knowledge, 4D has not released the v16 SDK.

Problems installing built application

2018-01-30 Thread James Knight via 4D_Tech
I’ve never managed to find a reliable way of installing a built application on our client Macs. Our network is 15 Macs running latest versions of 10.10 or 10.12. 4D is version 15.5 and I’m compiling an app using 4D Volume Desktop. The data is all stored in a MySQL database, accessed via the

Re: Win32API 8.1.2 gui_GetWindowEx("") in v16r5 (Seth Leeper)

2018-01-30 Thread Seth Leeper via 4D_Tech
Unfortunately, Orchard has made the decision to only support base releases in the Win32API and not R releases. As Peter mentioned, the code will remain freely available to the 4D community to modify as needed. To the best of my knowledge, 4D has not released the v16 SDK. Regards, Seth Leeper

Re: 10.13.2 running on a MacMini (Late 2014) 8GB RAM External RAID 0+1 Samsung SSD. Using SoftRaid XT

2018-01-30 Thread Tim Nevels via 4D_Tech
On Jan 30, 2018, at 2:00 PM, Jim Dorrance wrote: > Find a mac mini late 2012 i7 with ssd and 16 gb ram I agree. This is a fantastic little machine for running 4D Server on with under 20 users and a “medium sized” data file. This is how I currently categorized 4D data file sizes: Small is

Re: v13 - Number of field/array pairs for selection to array

2018-01-30 Thread Chip Scheide via 4D_Tech
v13 docs do not specify a limit to the pairings, but other commands (Query) have (or had) limits even without an acknowledgment from 4D. the '*' in this instance does not negate the need for Execute Formula, I considered that option. Thanks On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:32:56 +0100, Arnaud de Montard

Re: v13 - Number of field/array pairs for selection to array

2018-01-30 Thread Arnaud de Montard via 4D_Tech
> Le 29 janv. 2018 à 20:01, Douglas von Roeder via 4D_Tech > <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> a écrit : > > Chip: > > Perhaps the optional asterisk has removed that limit? Asterisk could also remove the need to use Execute Formula… -- Arnaud de Montard