Rudy,
I think you really need to disable the object(s) by code
Object set enabled(*;"object name";true/false)
or
Object set enterable(*;"object name";true/false)
to get the behavior you want. and you won't need the .png :)
Chip
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:08:39 +0200, Two Way Communications via
Rudy,
Perhaps OBJECT SET ENABLED?
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 4:10 AM Two Way Communications via 4D_Tech <
4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> Hi Kirk,
> Yes, of course. But I wanted to still show the underlying object with a
> ‘dimmed’ look. (I like beautiful interfaces ;-) )
> But this is a change in
> Le 28 juin 2018 à 11:08, Two Way Communications via 4D_Tech
> <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> a écrit :
>
> Has anyone else noticed this?
>
> I have a form that shows enterable variables, popups, picture buttons and
> rulers.
>
> In some cases I want to disable these objects. I put a rectangle
I would think that the blocking object must itself be a clickable object, like
an invisible button or a transparent input area.
**
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html
Archive:
Hi Kirk,
Yes, of course. But I wanted to still show the underlying object with a
‘dimmed’ look. (I like beautiful interfaces ;-) )
But this is a change in comparison to older versions, no? Because clicks are
received by the underlying objects, which was not the case in older versions.
Anyway,
Rudy,
If the 'covered' object is tabable simply placing another object on top of
it won't stop entry, it just makes it less apparent what's going on.
Instead of changing the visibility of the cover object why not just make
the enterable object itself invisible? This does make it non-enterable but
Has anyone else noticed this?
I have a form that shows enterable variables, popups, picture buttons and
rulers.
In some cases I want to disable these objects. I put a rectangle object on top
of it, and set this object’s visibility to ’true’.
I use a .png file that is semi-transparent, so the
7 matches
Mail list logo
