Re: Is a package preferred?

2017-10-20 Thread Keith Culotta via 4D_Tech
I switched back to folders for development. It's easier to manipulate the app's supporting folders and files. Users get a package, but like Chip said, you have to guard against the unintentional use of the datafile within the package. Keith - CDI > On Oct 19, 2017, at 5:41 PM, Robert ListMai

Re: Is a package preferred?

2017-10-20 Thread Chip Scheide via 4D_Tech
Other issue with package systems: - data file can be unintentionally replaced/lost during an update to the structure/package. ex: client copies new structure/package to old location overwriting existing structure/package -- datafile (other items(?)) LOST! I understand the idea - but I always mov

Re: Is a package preferred?

2017-10-19 Thread Keisuke Miyako via 4D_Tech
I think the difference is largely cosmetic, but spotlight might fail to locate files inside a package. (resources, for example) > 2017/10/20 7:41、Robert ListMail via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> のメール: > Regarding best practices, what approach do you favor? Do we like packages? :) **

Is a package preferred?

2017-10-19 Thread Robert ListMail via 4D_Tech
It seems like most of my Mac-based 4D databases are in a folder with the structure and datafile on the same level and where there might be a test data file in folder elsewhere. Yet, I have a few newly inherited Mac-based databases that are in packages. Regarding best practices, what approach do