then should not the syntax be:
($To_Validate->)->
dereference the handle, then dereference the pointer
On Thu, 25 May 2017 11:21:21 +0200, Bernd Fröhlich via 4D_Tech wrote:
> Chip Scheide:
>
>> I accidentally typed the following line of code:
>> $0:=(Type($To_Validate->->)=Is Pointer)
>>
>> Noti
Chip Scheide:
> I accidentally typed the following line of code:
> $0:=(Type($To_Validate->->)=Is Pointer)
>
> Notice anything wrong?
> At least the compiler did not...
>
> Error is :
> ->->
That is not an error. $To_Validate could be a pointer to a pointer, so from the
compiler´s viewpoint al
> Le 24 mai 2017 à 22:14, Chip Scheide via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> a
> écrit :
>
> seems like a bug to me
> :)
v17 feature.
non-disclosure agreement.
--
Arnaud de Montard
**
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
FAQ:
seems like a bug to me
:)
On Wed, 24 May 2017 14:16:32 -0500, Keith Culotta via 4D_Tech wrote:
> In v16 interpreted
>
> C_TEXT($t)
> C_POINTER($p1;$p2)
>
> $t:="A"
> $p1:=(->$t)
> $p2:=(->$p1)
>
> ALERT($p2->->) // Error
> ALERT(($p2->)->) // A
> ALERT(String(Type($p2->->))) // 2
> ALERT(Strin
In v16 interpreted
C_TEXT($t)
C_POINTER($p1;$p2)
$t:="A"
$p1:=(->$t)
$p2:=(->$p1)
ALERT($p2->->) // Error
ALERT(($p2->)->) // A
ALERT(String(Type($p2->->))) // 2
ALERT(String(Type(($p2->)->))) // 2
Type and Alert have different tolerances?
Keith - CDI
> On May 24, 2017, at 1:50 PM, Chip Sche
I accidentally typed the following line of code:
$0:=(Type($To_Validate->->)=Is Pointer)
Notice anything wrong?
At least the compiler did not...
Error is :
->->
I haven't checked newer versions
Chip
---
Gas is for washing parts
Alcohol is for drinkin'
Nitromethane is for racing
**
6 matches
Mail list logo
