Hi Chip,
> On 3 Aug 2017, at 04:20 AEST, Chip Scheide via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> is there simple way to move an entire (arbitrary) record to a blob?
Maybe you should take a look at ObjectTools commands OT PutRecord / OT
PutRecord / OT GetRecordTable.
Cheers
Jörg
> JSON Validate, Collections and a NULL command!
>
> http://blog.4d.com/en-whats-new-in-4d-v16-r4/
Nice improvements.
Unfortunately they didn't remove the limitation of the OB SET ARRAY command
regarding the support of two-dimensional arrays. At least the docs say:
> Note: It is not possible
It would be very handy for a lot of different reasons. A few months ago, I
added a feature request for it:
http://forums.4d.com/Post/EN/17757394/1/17757395#17757395
Please vote for it if you think it would be useful.
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 8:45 AM, Chip Scheide via 4D_Tech
I have a database I am using to test a component. Both component and
database are interpreted.
it has 2 tables, 1table with 1 field, and the other table with 3 fields.
It has 2 project methods for testing the component methods.
In this (testing) database, I open the component methods exposed
We have been working on making our web product more secure, and customer's
security testing was giving us a hard time.
I recently found this: https://observatory.mozilla.org/
It will test your site, and offer step by step advice on making it more
secure.
It's easily the most understandable
Hi,
This is an interesting subject...
I would say it depends on what you want to protect from and how deep are your
pockets...
As people said, it is difficult to encrypt the whole 4D database without
encryption being supported at the database engine level...
At the moment 4D does not support
Richard:
Hardware acceleration in the CPU is still not nearly as fast as this task being
done by the drive controller. All software runs through the CPU. Yes, the CPU
can support specific types of code which helps. Just like GPUs, the advanced
support in the drive controllers makes a big
John:
We did this big time long before 4D permitted it autosaving the ‘picture’
outside of the data file that they looked after. Therefore we had to look after
the saving, and when loading up the form we had to look after retrieving the
‘picture’ as well. It sounds like you have done almost
John,
Ouch. That definitely sounds like a bug to me, so I'd say file it wherever
you're meant to. I think that's on the beta release forum in France.
I can't offer any real help because the only time I've used the external
feature for lots of pictures, we went with letting 4D manage where to put
> On Aug 3, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Jody Bevan via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com>
> wrote:
>
> With what you have done now, how does 4D know the path of the document
> (picture) that you saved.
Jody,
With custom pathname you use the command SET EXTERNAL DATA PATH and the
path is saved
He David,
> Ouch. That definitely sounds like a bug to me, so I'd say file it wherever
> you're meant to. I think that's on the beta release forum in France.
Yep. I am nearly convinced that his is beta bug. I have already found a
couple of other bugs and reported them. I will wait a bit
THANKS
Actually, I'm not trying to do anything with this - at the moment.
I am working on a component for managing text, and a couple of routines
do records to text and record to blob/text, with the idea (no specific
implementation intent) of exporting to some other program/database.
I was
Hi Chip,
It depends on what you want to try to achieve with that command.
I’m using the code below to copy a complete 4D record binary into a blob. But
the only thing you normally can do with the resulting blob is to put it back
into a record.
AFAIK this is also the case with the API Pack (and
13 matches
Mail list logo
