Re: [6tisch] WGLC on the “Minimal Security Framework for 6TiSCH” document

2018-07-06 Thread Mališa Vučinić
Hello Göran, Thanks for the review. See my responses inline. Mališa On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:46 PM Göran Selander wrote: > Dear WG, Pascal, Thomas, > > I have reviewed draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-06 and have the > following feedback: > > > > Section 3 > > > "pledge identifier" > > >

[6tisch] Fw: Concerns about the CoJP message size, the need for BLOCK-WISE options and the use of NON-confirmable messages

2018-07-06 Thread William Vignat
Hello, Mališa Vučinić asked me to forward this mail regarding the size of messages exchanged as part of the Minimal Security Framework for 6TiSCH to the broader 6tisch mailing list, hence this message. Once again I strongly recommend not viewing it here but there:

[6tisch] Fw: Concerns about the CoJP message size, the need for BLOCK-WISE options and the use of NON-confirmable messages

2018-07-06 Thread William Vignat
Hello, Mališa Vučinić asked me to forward this mail regarding the size of messages exchanged as part of the Minimal Security Framework for 6TiSCH to the broader 6tisch mailing list, hence this message. Once again I strongly recommend not viewing it here but there:

[6tisch] Fw: Concerns about the CoJP message size, the need for BLOCK-WISE options and the use of NON-confirmable messages

2018-07-06 Thread William Vignat
Hello, Mališa Vučinić asked me to forward this mail regarding the size of messages exchanged as part of the Minimal Security Framework for 6TiSCH to the broader 6tisch mailing list, hence this message. Once again I strongly recommend not viewing it here but there: