Hello Michael:
I added the replacement tag to point on your earlier draft.
Also it appears that this draft aims artproposed standard rather than info,
doesn't it?
Cheers
Pascal
> -Original Message-
> From: 6tisch <6tisch-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
> Sent:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e WG
of the IETF.
Title : IEEE802.15.4 Informational Element encapsulation of
6tisch Join and Enrollment Information
c/not/now/
This is now corrected :)
> -Original Message-
> From: 6tisch <6tisch-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert
> (pthubert)
> Sent: vendredi 20 juillet 2018 16:56
> To: Michael Richardson
> Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [6tisch]
That's a oups Michael:
This is not corrected. The doc that was adopted is the "IEEE802.15.4
Informational Element encapsulation of 6tisch Join and Enrollment Information"
document,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon/
Same request, please submit
The 6TISCH WG has placed draft-richardson-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon
in state Adopted by a WG (entered by Pascal Thubert)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon/
___
Mališa Vučinić writes:
> For pairwise (KeyIdeMode 0) things are bit different, for example
> sending beacons using pairwise keys is not really useful. So for
> pairwise keys key usages like 6TiSCH-K2-* are something that are
> usuful.
>
> I see what you mean. Essentially, key
Thanks for the clarification. I still have a couple of misunderstandings,
see inline.
Mališa
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:47 AM Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Mališa Vučinić writes:
> > Thanks Tero for the proposal. Is the current "key_usage" registry enough
> to
> > fully configure the security tables