Mališa Vučinić writes:
> Yes, I think it can be made to work, but I think it is quite a lot of
> work and code just to be able to claim to be "stateless".
>
> I don't quite agree that what is typically a one-liner to schedule a timeout
> event and a couple of lines of code in the callback
Hi Tero,
Just getting back to this after my vacation, see inline.
Mališa
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:25 PM Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Mališa Vučinić writes:
> >
> > The question now is when to remove the entry with secExempt for
> > pledge at JP, once it was installed from Stateless-Proxy. From the
Hi Jim,
Apologies for responding to your email only now due to my vacation in
August.
I don't have any objection to your proposed solution and this indeed solves
the issue without introducing an additional message in the protocol.
I am slightly leaning towards the PIV being sent in the Bad
