Re: [6tisch] Clarification on MSF-06

2019-10-11 Thread Tengfei Chang
Thanks Abdussalam for the comments, I updated the text as following: The node SHOULD send some form of keep-alive messages to all its neighbors it has negotiated cell with. The node sends a keep- alive message to the neighbor if no frames is received from that neighbor within a

Re: [6tisch] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-12

2019-10-11 Thread Linda Dunbar
Malisa, Thank you very much for the change. It is very good. Linda From: Mališa Vučinić Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 4:18 AM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: ops-...@ietf.org; 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security@ietf.org Subject: Re: [6tisch] Opsdir last

Re: [6tisch] Clarification on MSF-06

2019-10-11 Thread Abdussalam Baryun
Hi Tengfei, I am interested like Christian to see the poll mechanism into this draft. I don't think it is right to refer to RFC7554 (problem statement) which is an informational RFC, while this draft is a proposed standard, I think it is better to state the mechanism into the use case of minimum

Re: [6tisch] Clarification on MSF-06

2019-10-11 Thread Tengfei Chang
Hi Christian, Thanks for pointing this issue out! The neighbor polling section is removed at 03 version. Can't remember why we removed it. I re-edited this sections to fit the current content of MSF draft. I paste it below. It will the be last step of boot behavior after it starts sending EB and

Re: [6tisch] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-12

2019-10-11 Thread Mališa Vučinić
Dear Linda, After a second look, I noticed that the ASN acronym only had a couple of occurrences in the text. To address your comment, I replaced the occurrences of “ASN" with the expanded version “absolute slot number” without defining the acronym in our document. The changes following your