[6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker writes: > I think we may need to say more about how a JP knows that "secExempt" is > in effect (see comment in Section 5), since that affects a critical > piece of the security posture of the network. secExempt process comes from the 802.15.4 and is not that well

Re: [6tisch] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-13: (with COMMENT)

Dear Alvaro, Many thanks for your review. I responded to your comments inline and you can find the proposed changes in the working version of the document at: https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security/commits/408b01c51282aa2cf04407de2bf6fcf0a4628a95

[6tisch] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-13: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

[6tisch] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-13: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please