Re: [6tisch] hepherd write up for draft-ietf-6tisch-msf: IPR statement

I am not aware of IPR that applies to this draft. regards Xavi Missatge de Mališa Vučinić del dia dj., 12 de des. 2019 a les 18:34: > I’m not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. > > Mališa > > On 12 Dec 2019, at 18:32, Prof. Diego Dujovne > wrote: > > “I’m not aware of any IPR that

Re: [6tisch] WGLC on draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-09

Hi Tengfei, Thank you for the updates. The new version addresses my comments. Here are a couple of trivial comments: (Section 5.1) The node MUST maintain the following counters for the selected parent on both negotiated Tx and Rx cells: To my understanding, we have separate pairs of

Re: [6tisch] WGLC on draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-09

My issues seem resolved Tengfei I’ll make a pass tomorrow and if / when I get all the authors to answer me on the IPR I’ll make the publication request. Regards, Pascal Le 12 déc. 2019 à 18:29, Tengfei Chang a écrit :  Hi All, As you may notice that the draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-09 is just

Re: [6tisch] hepherd write up for draft-ietf-6tisch-msf: IPR statement

I’m not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Mališa > On 12 Dec 2019, at 18:32, Prof. Diego Dujovne > wrote: > > “I’m not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft” > > Le jeu. 12 déc. 2019 à 14:31, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) > a écrit : > Dear all > >

[6tisch] hepherd write up for draft-ietf-6tisch-msf: IPR statement

Dear all It is time to publish draft-ietf-6tisch-msf, and as part of the process I need to confirm whether there is IPR on this specification. Authors: please confirm whether any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have

[6tisch] WGLC on draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-09

Hi All, As you may notice that the draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-09 is just published. We believe it resolved the comments mostly from Yatch and Pascal's review. (Thanks a lot for those comments again!) Yatch, Pascal, could you confirm they does resolve the issues? Also anyone else is more than

Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secured packets

ah... I agree with you . Just submitted the current version though. Will correct it in next version. On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:04 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) < pthub...@cisco.com> wrote: > A nit Tengfei : > > > > « *before it is passed to MSF. “* > > Would be > > *“before it is passed to the

[6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-msf-09.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e WG of the IETF. Title : 6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF) Authors : Tengfei Chang

Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secured packets

A nit Tengfei : « before it is passed to MSF. “ Would be “before it is passed to the 6top sublayer where MSF can observe it.” Or something similar? Otherwise, all good! Pascal From: 6tisch <6tisch-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tengfei Chang Sent: jeudi 12 décembre 2019 17:51 To: 6tisch

Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secured packets

All, The following is our internal discuss about this issue. We will add the following text in "Security Consideration " section in MSF-09: * MSF adapts to traffics containing packets from IP layer. It is possible that the IP packet has a non-zero DSCP (Diffserv Code