Dear all:
There was no comment on the 2nd last call. We are now entering the piublication
phase.
The chairs
From: Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
Sent: jeudi 7 mars 2019 15:45
To: 6tisch@ietf.org
Subject: 2nd WG LC on draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security
Dear all:
At the last IETF, we concluded
Done, thanks for the review! I closed the corresponding issues in bitbucket.
Mališa
> On 29 Mar 2019, at 07:19, Göran Selander wrote:
>
> Hi Mališa,
>
> Thanks for the update, this addresses my concerns.
>
> Editorial: Replace "entirely defined" with "specified".
>
> Göran
>
> On
Hi Mališa,
Thanks for the update, this addresses my concerns.
Editorial: Replace "entirely defined" with "specified".
Göran
On 2019-03-27, 23:16, "Mališa Vučinić" wrote:
Dear Göran,
Many thanks for the review! As we discussed during the WG meeting, I added
new text in
Dear Göran,
Many thanks for the review! As we discussed during the WG meeting, I added new
text in the draft to stress that the procedure in Appendix B.2 of OSCORE should
be used in the case of a failure event occurring at the JRC. The use of this
procedure is now RECOMMENDED, and in case it
Dear 6TiSCH,
Sorry for very late response, here are a some post-2nd WGLC comments on
draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security-09:
Summary: With one exception detailed below the draft seems to be in good shape
and essentially only need some harmonizing updates following the last changes
to OSCORE
Dear all:
At the last IETF, we concluded the WGLC on draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security
and concluded it was mostly ready. It received 7 reviews during the last WGLC,
all of which had been integrated, and received reviewers approval.
Two final changes were still needed. Malisa was to discuss
