Re: [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-00.txt

2018-09-27 Thread Georgios Z. Papadopoulos
Hello Michael, > On Sep 23, 2018, at 22:38, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > Georgios Z. Papadopoulos wrote: >> Many thanks for this work. Going through the draft, I have a >> comment/question : > >> Considering that “The containing Enhanced Beacon is not encrypted.” >> (Section 3), is it

Re: [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-00.txt

2018-09-23 Thread Prof. Diego Dujovne
Michael, I agree on putting the rank to the maximum value to code that the network is not interested in accepting more members, thus, keeping their internal data private. Regards, Diego Le dim. 23 sept. 2018 à 17:38, Michael Richardson a écrit : > >

Re: [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-00.txt

2018-09-23 Thread Michael Richardson
Georgios Z. Papadopoulos wrote: > Many thanks for this work. Going through the draft, I have a > comment/question : > Considering that “The containing Enhanced Beacon is not encrypted.” > (Section 3), is it necessary to include “rank priority” at L2 and, > thus, revealing

Re: [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-00.txt

2018-09-23 Thread Georgios Z. Papadopoulos
Hello Michael, Many thanks for this work. Going through the draft, I have a comment/question : Considering that “The containing Enhanced Beacon is not encrypted.” (Section 3), is it necessary to include “rank priority” at L2 and, thus, revealing this information? Thanks, Georgios > On Jul

Re: [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-00.txt

2018-07-23 Thread Michael Richardson
Randy Turner wrote: > Looking at the enrollment-enhanced-beacon draft, I think some vendors > already employ this technique to address the bandwidth issues you > raise > in the draft (advertisement slots, etc.)….so the rationale for this > draft is probably well established.

Re: [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-00.txt

2018-07-22 Thread Randy Turner
Hi Michael, Looking at the enrollment-enhanced-beacon draft, I think some vendors already employ this technique to address the bandwidth issues you raise in the draft (advertisement slots, etc.)….so the rationale for this draft is probably well established. I had a couple of comments on this

Re: [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-00.txt

2018-07-21 Thread Michael Richardson
Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote: > Also it appears that this draft aims artproposed standard rather than > info, doesn't it? I agree that it needs to be proposed standard. The document says Informational, which I agree is wrong, and I'll fix it. -- Michael Richardson , Sandelman

Re: [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-00.txt

2018-07-20 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
f.org > Sent: vendredi 20 juillet 2018 20:01 > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org > Subject: [6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon- > 00.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories.

[6tisch] I-D Action: draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-00.txt

2018-07-20 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e WG of the IETF. Title : IEEE802.15.4 Informational Element encapsulation of 6tisch Join and Enrollment Information